ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2011
The appropriateness of enoxaparin use in Lebanese hospitals: a quality evaluation study.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough, guidelines for the appropriate use of enoxaparin are published, yet the extent of their implementation in clinical practice is still questionable. Furthermore, the optimal dosing of enoxaparin in special populations such as renal insufficiency and obesity remains controversial. In the Middle East, there are insufficient data on the appropriateness of enoxaparin use in different indications.
objective(1) To assess the appropriateness of enoxaparin dosing and duration per indication in compliance with the recommended guidelines and their impact on safety and efficacy outcomes in Lebanese health care centers. (2) To evaluate the influence of the hospital type (teaching vs. non-teaching) on the extent of compliance with established guidelines.
settingSeventeen health care centers in Lebanon, including teaching and non-teaching hospitals.
methodsAn observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted in 17 Lebanese hospitals. Data on demographics, indication, dosing regimen and clinical outcomes were collected. The appropriateness of dosing practices was determined as per the ACCP guidelines and the FDA dosing recommendations.
main outcome measureThe appropriateness of enoxaparin dosing was compared across different hospital type and among special populations including severe renal insufficiency and very obese patients.
resultsOf the 463 patients who participated in the study, 40% received improper enoxaparin dosing, which was mostly observed in the VTE prophylaxis group (41.6%, P < 0.001). When comparing the overall dosing practices in Lebanese hospitals, there was no statistically significant difference in the correctness of enoxaparin dosing between teaching and non-teaching hospitals (61.6% vs. 58.2%, P = 0.449), respectively. Only 11.5% of renally impaired patients and 59.4% of obese patients received correct doses.
conclusionThis study highlighted the improper practice and thus the need of implementation of clinical practice guidelines for the dosing of enoxaparin, in Lebanese hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.