Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21909442›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2011

In silico analysis of six known Leishmania major antigens and in vitro evaluation of specific epitopes eliciting HLA-A2 restricted CD8 T cell response.

Negar Seyed, Farnaz Zahedifard, Shima Safaiyan, Elham Gholami, Fatemeh Doustdari, Kayhan Azadmanesh, Maryam Mirzaei, Nasir Saeedi Eslami, Akbar Khadem Sadegh, Ali Eslami Far and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Epitope mapping ofHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Nanotheranostics against COVID-19: From multivalent to immune-targeted materials.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Immunization againstIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. VianniaTopes: a database of predicted immunogenic peptides for Leishmania (Viannia) species.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
  12. Peptide Vaccines for Leishmaniasis.Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  13. Antigenicity ofFrontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Poly(Lactic-Frontiers in immunology · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Negar SeyedMolecular Immunology and Vaccine Research Lab, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Farnaz Zahedifard
Shima Safaiyan
Elham Gholami
Fatemeh Doustdari
Kayhan Azadmanesh
Maryam Mirzaei
Nasir Saeedi Eslami
Akbar Khadem Sadegh
Ali Eslami Far
Iraj Sharifi
Sima Rafati
Pasteur Institute of Iran · IRKerman University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a potent CD8(+) T cell activator, peptide vaccine has found its way in vaccine development against intracellular infections and cancer, but not against leishmaniasis. The first step toward a peptide vaccine is epitope mapping of different proteins according to the most frequent HLA types in a population. METHODS AND

findingsSix Leishmania (L.) major-related candidate antigens (CPB,CPC,LmsTI-1,TSA,LeIF and LPG-3) were screened for potential CD8(+) T cell activating 9-mer epitopes presented by HLA-A*0201 (the most frequent HLA-A allele). Online software including SYFPEITHI, BIMAS, EpiJen, Rankpep, nHLApred, NetCTL and Multipred were used. Peptides were selected only if predicted by almost all programs, according to their predictive scores. Pan-A2 presentation of selected peptides was confirmed by NetMHCPan1.1. Selected peptides were pooled in four peptide groups and the immunogenicity was evaluated by in vitro stimulation and intracellular cytokine assay of PBMCs from HLA-A2(+) individuals recovered from L. major. HLA-A2(-) individuals recovered from L. major and HLA-A2(+) healthy donors were included as control groups. Individual response of HLA-A2(+) recovered volunteers as percent of CD8(+)/IFN-γ(+) T cells after in vitro stimulation against peptide pools II and IV was notably higher than that of HLA-A2(-) recovered individuals. Based on cutoff scores calculated from the response of HLA-A2(-) recovered individuals, 31.6% and 13.3% of HLA-A2(+) recovered persons responded above cutoff in pools II and IV, respectively. ELISpot and ELISA results confirmed flow cytometry analysis. The response of HLA-A2(-) recovered individuals against peptide pools I and III was detected similar and even higher than HLA-A2(+) recovered individuals.

conclusionUsing in silico prediction we demonstrated specific response to LmsTI-1 (pool II) and LPG-3- (pool IV) related peptides specifically presented in HLA-A*0201 context. This is among the very few reports mapping L. major epitopes for human HLA types. Studies like this will speed up polytope vaccine idea towards leishmaniasis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntigens, ProtozoanCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCells, CulturedChildComputational BiologyCytokinesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFemaleHLA-A2 AntigenHumansLeishmania majorLeukocytes, MononuclearMaleAntigens, ProtozoanCytokinesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHLA-A2 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID21909442
PMCPMC3167772
OpenAlexW1997718988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.