Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21909323›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2011

Combined liquid and solid-phase extraction improves quantification of brain estrogen content.

Andrew Chao, Barney A Schlinger, Luke Remage-Healey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Arbiters of endogenous opioid analgesia: role of CNS estrogenic and glutamatergic systems.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Adverse Effects of Aromatase Inhibition on the Brain and Behavior in a Nonhuman Primate.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Establishing regional specificity of neuroestrogen action.General and comparative endocrinology · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Brain estrogen signaling effects acute modulation of acoustic communication behaviors: A working hypothesis.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew ChaoLaboratory of Neuroendocrinology, Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, Brain Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Barney A Schlinger
Luke Remage-Healey
University of Massachusetts Amherst · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Modulation of forebrain circuits by local neurosteroid productionR00NS066179 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI REMAGE-HEALEY, LUKE R · 2010 to 2012
$721k
Rapid steroidogenesis in the brain.F32NS058009 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI REMAGE-HEALEY, LUKE R · 2007 to 2009
$119k
Modulation of forebrain circuits by local neurosteroid productionK99NS066179 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI REMAGE-HEALEY, LUKE R · 2009 to 2010
$98k
NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS058009NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS066179NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS066179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accuracy in quantifying brain-derived steroid hormones ("neurosteroids") has become increasingly important for understanding the modulation of neuronal activity, development, and physiology. Relative to other neuroactive compounds and classical neurotransmitters, steroids pose particular challenges with regard to isolation and analysis, owing to their lipid solubility. Consequently, anatomical studies of the distribution of neurosteroids have relied primarily on the expression of neurosteroid synthesis enzymes. To evaluate the distribution of synthesis enzymes vis-à-vis the actual steroids themselves, traditional steroid quantification assays, including radioimmunoassays, have successfully employed liquid extraction methods (e.g., ether, dichloromethane, or methanol) to isolate steroids from microdissected brain tissue. Due to their sensitivity, safety, and reliability, the use of commercial enzyme-immunoassays (EIA) for laboratory quantification of steroids in plasma and brain has become increasingly widespread. However, EIAs rely on enzymatic reactions in vitro, making them sensitive to interfering substances in brain tissue and thus producing unreliable results. Here, we evaluate the effectiveness of a protocol for combined, two-stage liquid/solid-phase extraction (SPE) as compared to conventional liquid extraction alone for the isolation of estradiol (E(2)) from brain tissue. We employ the songbird model system, in which brain steroid production is pronounced and linked to neural mechanisms of learning and plasticity. This study outlines a combined liquid-SPE protocol that improves the performance of a commercial EIA for the quantification of brain E(2) content. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our optimized method for evaluating the region specificity of brain E(2) content, compare these results to established anatomy of the estrogen synthesis enzyme and estrogen receptor, and discuss the nature of potential EIA interfering substances.

Indexed as

ELISAestrogenneurosteroidprotocol

Identifiers

PMID21909323
PMCPMC3164112
OpenAlexW2164154062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.