Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21909283›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2011

An iterative genetic and dynamical modelling approach identifies novel features of the gene regulatory network underlying melanocyte development.

Emma R Greenhill, Andrea Rocco, Laura Vibert, Masataka Nikaido, Robert N Kelsh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emma R GreenhillDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry and Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Andrea Rocco
Laura Vibert
Masataka Nikaido
Robert N Kelsh
University of Bath · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council G0300415Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 066326Wellcome Trust 083770/Z/07/ZWellcome Trust 087870/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms generating stably differentiated cell-types from multipotent precursors are key to understanding normal development and have implications for treatment of cancer and the therapeutic use of stem cells. Pigment cells are a major derivative of neural crest stem cells and a key model cell-type for our understanding of the genetics of cell differentiation. Several factors driving melanocyte fate specification have been identified, including the transcription factor and master regulator of melanocyte development, Mitf, and Wnt signalling and the multipotency and fate specification factor, Sox10, which drive mitf expression. While these factors together drive multipotent neural crest cells to become specified melanoblasts, the mechanisms stabilising melanocyte differentiation remain unclear. Furthermore, there is controversy over whether Sox10 has an ongoing role in melanocyte differentiation. Here we use zebrafish to explore in vivo the gene regulatory network (GRN) underlying melanocyte specification and differentiation. We use an iterative process of mathematical modelling and experimental observation to explore methodically the core melanocyte GRN we have defined. We show that Sox10 is not required for ongoing differentiation and expression is downregulated in differentiating cells, in response to Mitfa and Hdac1. Unexpectedly, we find that Sox10 represses Mitf-dependent expression of melanocyte differentiation genes. Our systems biology approach allowed us to predict two novel features of the melanocyte GRN, which we then validate experimentally. Specifically, we show that maintenance of mitfa expression is Mitfa-dependent, and identify Sox9b as providing an Mitfa-independent input to melanocyte differentiation. Our data supports our previous suggestion that Sox10 only functions transiently in regulation of mitfa and cannot be responsible for long-term maintenance of mitfa expression; indeed, Sox10 is likely to slow melanocyte differentiation in the zebrafish embryo. More generally, this novel approach to understanding melanocyte differentiation provides a basis for systematic modelling of differentiation in this and other cell-types.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationGene Regulatory NetworksHistone Deacetylase 1MelanocytesMicrophthalmia-Associated Transcription FactorModels, TheoreticalNeural CrestSOX9 Transcription FactorSOXE Transcription FactorsStem CellsWnt Signaling PathwayZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsHDAC1 protein, zebrafishHistone Deacetylase 1Microphthalmia-Associated Transcription Factormitfa protein, zebrafishsox10 protein, zebrafishSox9b protein, zebrafishSOX9 Transcription FactorSOXE Transcription FactorsZebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21909283
PMCPMC3164703
OpenAlexW2107143931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.