Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21909127›Full record

ArticleCellular & molecular immunology2012

Discrimination of membrane antigen affinity by B cells requires dominance of kinetic proofreading over serial engagement.

Philippos K Tsourkas, Wanli Liu, Somkanya C Das, Susan K Pierce, Subhadip Raychaudhuri

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular & molecular immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Proofreading does not result in more reliable ligand discrimination in receptor signaling due to its inherent stochasticity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Replacement of TCR Dβ With Immunoglobulin DFrontiers in immunology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ezrin tunes the magnitude of humoral immunity.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2013
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philippos K TsourkasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California-Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Wanli Liu
Somkanya C Das
Susan K Pierce
Subhadip Raychaudhuri
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

The Initiation of B-Cell SignalingZIAAI000898 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI PIERCE, SUSAN · 2009 to 2025
$30.9M
A novel computational model of B cell signaling and activationR01AI074022 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BENHAM, CRAIG J. · 2008 to 2011
$1.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AI000898NIAID NIH HHS AI074022NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI074022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B-cell receptor signaling in response to membrane-bound antigen increases with antigen affinity, a process known as affinity discrimination. We use computational modeling to show that B-cell affinity discrimination requires that kinetic proofreading predominate over serial engagement. We find that if B-cell receptors become signaling-capable immediately upon antigen binding, which results in decreasing serial engagement as affinity increases, then increasing affinity can lead to weaker signaling. Rather, antigen must stay bound to B-cell receptors for a threshold time of several seconds before becoming signaling-capable, a process similar to kinetic proofreading. This process overcomes the loss in serial engagement due to increasing antigen affinity, and replicates the monotonic increase in B-cell signaling with increasing affinity that has been observed in B-cell activation experiments. This finding matches well with the experimentally observed time (∼20 s) required for the B-cell receptor signaling domains to undergo antigen and lipid raft-mediated conformational changes that lead to Src-family kinase recruitment. We hypothesize that the physical basis for a threshold time of antigen binding might lie in the formation timescale of B-cell receptor dimers. The time required for dimer formation decreases with increasing antigen affinity, thereby resulting in shorter threshold antigen binding times as affinity increases. Such an affinity-dependent kinetic proofreading requirement results in affinity discrimination very similar to that observed in biological experiments. B-cell affinity discrimination is critical to the process of affinity maturation and the production of high-affinity antibodies, and thus our results have important implications in applications such as vaccine design.

Indexed as

Models, ImmunologicalAnimalsAntibodiesAntibody AffinityAntibody FormationAntigensB-LymphocytesHumansKineticsMembrane MicrodomainsProtein MultimerizationReceptors, Antigen, B-CellSignal TransductionAntibodiesAntigensReceptors, Antigen, B-Cell

Identifiers

PMID21909127
PMCPMC3756518
OpenAlexW2066342287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.