Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21909086›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2011

Coordinated dynamic encoding in the retina using opposing forms of plasticity.

David B Kastner, Stephen A Baccus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adaptation of retinal discriminability to natural scenes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Information Geometry of the Retinal Representation Manifold.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David B KastnerNeuroscience Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Stephen A Baccus
Stanford University · US

Funding

Function and circuitry of adaptive inhibition in the retinaR01EY022933 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN A BACCUS · 2013 to 2026
$4.8M
Circuit Mechanisms of Neural Coding in the RetinaR01EY016842 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BACCUS, STEPHEN A · 2006 to 2010
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016842NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The range of natural inputs encoded by a neuron often exceeds its dynamic range. To overcome this limitation, neural populations divide their inputs among different cell classes, as with rod and cone photoreceptors, and adapt by shifting their dynamic range. We report that the dynamic behavior of retinal ganglion cells in salamanders, mice and rabbits is divided into two opposing forms of short-term plasticity in different cell classes. One population of cells exhibited sensitization-a persistent elevated sensitivity following a strong stimulus. This newly observed dynamic behavior compensates for the information loss caused by the known process of adaptation occurring in a separate cell population. The two populations divide the dynamic range of inputs, with sensitizing cells encoding weak signals and adapting cells encoding strong signals. In the two populations, the linear, threshold and adaptive properties are linked to preserve responsiveness when stimulus statistics change, with one population maintaining the ability to respond when the other fails.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNonlinear DynamicsAction PotentialsAdaptation, OcularAmbystomaAnimalsInformation TheoryMiceNeuronal PlasticityPhotic StimulationRabbitsRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsSensitivity and SpecificityVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID21909086
PMCPMC3359137
OpenAlexW2092515857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.