Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21908872›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2011

Clinical and neuroanatomical signatures of tissue pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Jonathan D Rohrer, Tammaryn Lashley, Jonathan M Schott, Jane E Warren, Simon Mead, Adrian M Isaacs, Jonathan Beck, John Hardy, Rohan de Silva, Elizabeth Warrington and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 186 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
186citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

186 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

126 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Jonathan D RohrerDementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Tammaryn Lashley
Jonathan M Schott
Jane E Warren
Simon Mead
Adrian M Isaacs
Jonathan Beck
John Hardy
Rohan de Silva
Elizabeth Warrington
Claire Troakes
Safa Al-Sarraj
Andrew King
Barbara Borroni
Matthew J Clarkson
Sebastien Ourselin
Janice L Holton
Nick C Fox
Tamas Revesz
Martin N Rossor
Jason D Warren

Funding

Medical Research Council G0501560Medical Research Council G0501560(76517)Medical Research Council G0600676Medical Research Council G0601846Medical Research Council G0701075Medical Research Council G0801306Medical Research Council MC_U123160651Medical Research Council MC_U123182015Wellcome Trust 091673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relating clinical symptoms to neuroanatomical profiles of brain damage and ultimately to tissue pathology is a key challenge in the field of neurodegenerative disease and particularly relevant to the heterogeneous disorders that comprise the frontotemporal lobar degeneration spectrum. Here we present a retrospective analysis of clinical, neuropsychological and neuroimaging (volumetric and voxel-based morphometric) features in a pathologically ascertained cohort of 95 cases of frontotemporal lobar degeneration classified according to contemporary neuropathological criteria. Forty-eight cases (51%) had TDP-43 pathology, 42 (44%) had tau pathology and five (5%) had fused-in-sarcoma pathology. Certain relatively specific clinicopathological associations were identified. Semantic dementia was predominantly associated with TDP-43 type C pathology; frontotemporal dementia and motoneuron disease with TDP-43 type B pathology; young-onset behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia with FUS pathology; and the progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome with progressive supranuclear palsy pathology. Progressive non-fluent aphasia was most commonly associated with tau pathology. However, the most common clinical syndrome (behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia) was pathologically heterogeneous; while pathologically proven Pick's disease and corticobasal degeneration were clinically heterogeneous, and TDP-43 type A pathology was associated with similar clinical features in cases with and without progranulin mutations. Volumetric magnetic resonance imaging, voxel-based morphometry and cluster analyses of the pathological groups here suggested a neuroanatomical framework underpinning this clinical and pathological diversity. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration-associated pathologies segregated based on their cerebral atrophy profiles, according to the following scheme: asymmetric, relatively localized (predominantly temporal lobe) atrophy (TDP-43 type C); relatively symmetric, relatively localized (predominantly temporal lobe) atrophy (microtubule-associated protein tau mutations); strongly asymmetric, distributed atrophy (Pick's disease); relatively symmetric, predominantly extratemporal atrophy (corticobasal degeneration, fused-in-sarcoma pathology). TDP-43 type A pathology was associated with substantial individual variation; however, within this group progranulin mutations were associated with strongly asymmetric, distributed hemispheric atrophy. We interpret the findings in terms of emerging network models of neurodegenerative disease: the neuroanatomical specificity of particular frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathologies may depend on an interaction of disease-specific and network-specific factors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrainCluster AnalysisCohort StudiesDNA-Binding ProteinsFrontotemporal Lobar DegenerationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPick Disease of the BrainRetrospective StudiesRNA-Binding Protein FUStau ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsMAPT protein, humanRNA-Binding Protein FUStau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21908872
PMCPMC3170537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.