Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21908754›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law2011

Contingency management treatment in substance abusers with and without legal problems.

Nancy M Petry, Carla J Rash, Caroline J Easton

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Contingency management treatment for substance use disorders: How far has it come, and where does it need to go?Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2017
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nancy M PetryCalhoun Cardiology Center, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-3944, USA. npetry@uchc.edu
Carla J Rash
Caroline J Easton
UConn Health · US

Funding

TSF to enhance treatment of cocaine dependenceP50DA009241 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PETRY, NANCY M · 1994 to 2018
$40.5M
ZONISAMIDE VERSUS PLACEBOM01RR006192 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI KRANZLER, HENRY RICHARD · 1994 to 2008
$22.1M
Vulnerabilities for coping-related drinking among post-college young adultsP60AA003510 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI PETRY, NANCY M · 2008 to 2017
$17.5M
VOUCHERS VS PRIZES--CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENTR01DA013444 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI ALESSI, SHEILA MARIE · 2000 to 2015
$6.2M
POST-DOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN ALCOHOL STUDIEST32AA007290 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI SHEILA MARIE ALESSI · 1985 to 2026
$3.2M
Reinforcing Exercise in Cocaine AbusersR01DA027615 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI PETRY, NANCY M · 2009 to 2013
$3.2M
Group-Based Contingency Management/Outpatient TreatmentR01DA018883 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI PETRY, NANCY M · 2004 to 2008
$2.0M
Recovery Enhancement With Awards Enhancement With Awards Research Dissemination (P30DA023918 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI PETRY, NANCY M · 2009 to 2010
$1.8M
Training Therapists to Administer Contingency ManagementR01DA016855 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI PETRY, NANCY M · 2003 to 2007
$1.8M
Healthy Activities for Prize Incentives (HAPI)R01DA022739 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI PETRY, NANCY M · 2008 to 2012
$1.3M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR006192NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR06192NIAAA NIH HHS AA-T3207290NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA003510NIAAA NIH HHS P60-AA03510NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007290NIDA NIH HHS 01-DA022739NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA023918NIDA NIH HHS P30-DA023918NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA009241NIDA NIH HHS P50-DA09241NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013444NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016855NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA016855NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018883NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA018883NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022739NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA027615NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA027615NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA13444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug and alcohol abusers frequently have legal difficulties, and the legal system often provides negative reinforcement for substance abuse treatment. In contrast, contingency management (CM) treatments utilize positive reinforcement procedures to improve patient outcomes. This study evaluated whether substance-abusing patients with legal problems at treatment entry had differential outcomes, in general and in response to CM, compared with those without legal problems. Data from three randomized CM trials (n = 393) were used in an evaluation of main and interactive effects of legal status and treatment condition, with respect to retention and abstinence. Compared with patients without legal difficulties, those with legal problems remained in treatment for shorter durations and achieved shorter periods of abstinence. CM was positively and significantly associated with longer durations of abstinence, regardless of legal status. Results suggest that substance abusers with legal problems have generally poor outcomes, but that CM is effective regardless of the patient's legal status.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdultDrug UsersFemaleHumansMaleNew EnglandSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID21908754
PMCPMC3616315
OpenAlexW2114385507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.