Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21907203›Full record

ArticleHormones and behavior2011

Individual differences in the motivation to communicate relate to levels of midbrain and striatal catecholamine markers in male European starlings.

Sarah A Heimovics, Katrina G Salvante, Keith W Sockman, Lauren V Riters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hormones and behavior, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah A HeimovicsDept of Zoology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA. saheimovics@psych.ubc.ca
Katrina G Salvante
Keith W Sockman
Lauren V Riters
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Opioids and individual differences in social communicationR01MH080225 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RITERS, LAUREN V · 2008 to 2017
$3.2M
Noradrenergic Integration of Social InformationR01NS055125 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SOCKMAN, KEITH W. · 2007 to 2010
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080225NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals display dramatic differences in social communication even within similar social contexts. Across vertebrates dopaminergic projections from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and midbrain central gray (GCt) strongly influence motivated, reward-directed behaviors. Norepinephrine is also rich in these areas and may alter dopamine neuronal activity. The present study was designed to provide insight into the roles of dopamine and norepinephrine in VTA and GCt and their efferent striatal target, song control region area X, in the regulation of individual differences in the motivation to sing. We used high pressure liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection to measure dopamine, norepinephrine and their metabolites in micropunched samples from VTA, GCt, and area X in male European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). We categorized males as sexually motivated or non-sexually motivated based on individual differences in song produced in response to a female. Dopamine markers and norepinephrine in VTA and dopamine in area X correlated positively with sexually-motivated song. Norepinephrine in area X correlated negatively with non-sexually-motivated song. Dopamine in GCt correlated negatively with sexually-motivated song, and the metabolite DOPAC correlated positively with non-sexually-motivated song. Results highlight a role for evolutionarily conserved dopaminergic projections from VTA to striatum in the motivation to communicate and highlight novel patterns of catecholamine activity in area X, VTA, and GCt associated with individual differences in sexually-motivated and non-sexually-motivated communication. Correlations between dopamine and norepinephrine markers also suggest that norepinephrine may contribute to individual differences in communication by modifying dopamine neuronal activity in VTA and GCt.

Indexed as

AnimalsDopamineFemaleIndividualityMaleMesencephalonMotivationNeostriatumNorepinephrineStarlingsVocalization, AnimalDopamineNorepinephrine

Identifiers

PMID21907203
PMCPMC3827950
OpenAlexW2032655066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.