Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21906590›Full record

ReviewExperimental eye research2012

Proliferative capacity of corneal endothelial cells.

Nancy C Joyce

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental eye research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 170 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
170citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

170 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 340 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emerging treatments for corneal endothelium decompensation - a systematic review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Subclinical corneal endothelial alterations in Familial Mediterranean Fever patients during clinical remission.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Generation of a Novel Col8a2Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Transepithelial corneal cross-linking: a review.International ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nancy C JoyceSchepens Eye Research Institute and Dept. of Ophthalmology, 20 Staniford Street, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. nancy.joyce@schepens.harvard.edu
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · US

Funding

MOLECULAR INDUCTION OF CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL PROLIFERATIONR01EY012700 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI JOYCE, NANCY C. · 2000 to 2009
$3.9M
PHARMACOLOGY OF THE CORNEAL ENDOTHELIUMR01EY005767 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI JOYCE, NANCY C. · 1985 to 2005
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY005767NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The corneal endothelial monolayer helps maintain corneal transparency through its barrier and ionic "pump" functions. This transparency function can become compromised, resulting in a critical loss in endothelial cell density (ECD), corneal edema, bullous keratopathy, and loss of visual acuity. Although penetrating keratoplasty and various forms of endothelial keratoplasty are capable of restoring corneal clarity, they can also have complications requiring re-grafting or other treatments. With the increasing worldwide shortage of donor corneas to be used for keratoplasty, there is a greater need to find new therapies to restore corneal clarity that is lost due to endothelial dysfunction. As a result, researchers have been exploring alternative approaches that could result in the in vivo induction of transient corneal endothelial cell division or the in vitro expansion of healthy endothelial cells for corneal bioengineering as treatments to increase ECD and restore visual acuity. This review presents current information regarding the ability of human corneal endothelial cells (HCEC) to divide as a basis for the development of new therapies. Information will be presented on the positive and negative regulation of the cell cycle as background for the studies to be discussed. Results of studies exploring the proliferative capacity of HCEC will be presented and specific conditions that affect the ability of HCEC to divide will be discussed. Methods that have been tested to induce transient proliferation of HCEC will also be presented. This review will discuss the effect of donor age and endothelial topography on relative proliferative capacity of HCEC, as well as explore the role of nuclear oxidative DNA damage in decreasing the relative proliferative capacity of HCEC. Finally, potential new research directions will be discussed that could take advantage of and/or improve the proliferative capacity of these physiologically important cells in order to develop new treatments to restore corneal clarity.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationAge FactorsAnimalsCell Cycle CheckpointsCorneaCorneal DiseasesCorneal TransplantationDNA DamageDonor SelectionEndothelial CellsHumansOxidative StressTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID21906590
PMCPMC3261346
OpenAlexW2071032594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.