ArticleAnnals of intensive care2011
Surviving sepsis: going beyond the guidelines.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decision-making in emergency colorectal surgery for cancer.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Reliability of bioreactance and arterial waveform analyses in monitoring stroke volume variation during cardiac surgery.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Observational
- Extracorporeal blood purification strategies in sepsis and septic shock: An insight into recent advancements.World journal of critical care medicine · 2023Review
- Plasma cfDNA predictors of established bacteraemic infection.Access microbiology · 2022Article
- Effects of impaired microvascular flow regulation on metabolism-perfusion matching and organ function.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2021Review
- Article
- Activation of the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway: A potential response to long-term neuronal loss in the hippocampus after sepsis.Neural regeneration research · 2017Article
- Rapamycin Protects Sepsis-Induced Cognitive Impairment in Mouse Hippocampus by Enhancing Autophagy.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2017Article
- Managing sepsis: Electronic recognition, rapid response teams, and standardized care save lives.Journal of critical care · 2017Article
- Fourth Surviving Sepsis Campaign's hemodynamic recommendations: a step forward or a return to chaos?Critical care (London, England) · 2017Article
- Carbon Monoxide Improves Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells During Sepsis by Production of Specialized Proresolving Lipid Mediators.Critical care medicine · 2016Article
- Implementing sepsis bundles.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Review
- A Comparative Study to Assess the Determinants and Outcomes of Sepsis Treated in Medical Wards and ICU in an Indian Teaching Hospital.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016Article
- Complement Factor B Production in Renal Tubular Cells and Its Role in Sodium Transporter Expression During Polymicrobial Sepsis.Critical care medicine · 2016Article
- Sepsis and ARDS: The Dark Side of Histones.Mediators of inflammation · 2015Review
- Role of cardiac- and myeloid-MyD88 signaling in endotoxin shock: a study with tissue-specific deletion models.Anesthesiology · 2014Article
- Back to basics in sepsis treatment: critically ill patients need intensive care.Critical care (London, England) · 2014Article
- Iatrogenic salt water drowning and the hazards of a high central venous pressure.Annals of intensive care · 2014Review
- Late anxiety-like behavior and neuroinflammation in mice subjected to sublethal polymicrobial sepsis.Neurotoxicity research · 2013Article
- [Musculoskeletal infections in the era of multiresistant pathogens].Der Unfallchirurg · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign is a global effort to improve the care of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. The first Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines were published in 2004 with an updated version published in 2008. These guidelines have been endorsed by many professional organizations throughout the world and come regarded as the standard of care for the management of patients with severe sepsis. Unfortunately, most of the recommendations of these guidelines are not evidence-based. Furthermore, the major components of the 6-hour bundle are based on a single-center study whose validity has been recently under increasing scrutiny. This paper reviews the validity of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 6-hour bundle and provides a more evidence-based approach to the initial resuscitation of patients with severe sepsis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.