Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21906295›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2011

Reference genes for quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction expression studies in wild and cultivated peanut.

Carolina V Morgante, Patricia M Guimarães, Andressa Cq Martins, Ana Cg Araújo, Soraya Cm Leal-Bertioli, David J Bertioli, Ana Cm Brasileiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. miRNA-Mediated Regulation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Identification and expression profiling ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Allelic expression ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  9. Engineering Resistance againstPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transcriptome Responses of WildPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Contrasting Effects of WildFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carolina V MorganteEMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Parque Estação Biológica, CP 02372, Final W5 Norte, Brasília, DF - Brazil. brasileiro@cenargen.embrapa.br.
Patricia M Guimarães
Andressa Cq Martins
Ana Cg Araújo
Soraya Cm Leal-Bertioli
David J Bertioli
Ana Cm Brasileiro

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWild peanut species (Arachis spp.) are a rich source of new alleles for peanut improvement. Plant transcriptome analysis under specific experimental conditions helps the understanding of cellular processes related, for instance, to development, stress response, and crop yield. The validation of these studies has been generally accomplished by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) which requires normalization of mRNA levels among samples. This can be achieved by comparing the expression ratio between a gene of interest and a reference gene which is constitutively expressed. Nowadays there is a lack of appropriate reference genes for both wild and cultivated Arachis. The identification of such genes would allow a consistent analysis of qRT-PCR data and speed up candidate gene validation in peanut.

resultsA set of ten reference genes were analyzed in four Arachis species (A. magna; A. duranensis; A. stenosperma and A. hypogaea) subjected to biotic (root-knot nematode and leaf spot fungus) and abiotic (drought) stresses, in two distinct plant organs (roots and leaves). By the use of three programs (GeNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper) and taking into account the entire dataset, five of these ten genes, ACT1 (actin depolymerizing factor-like protein), UBI1 (polyubiquitin), GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase), 60S (60S ribosomal protein L10) and UBI2 (ubiquitin/ribosomal protein S27a) emerged as top reference genes, with their stability varying in eight subsets. The former three genes were the most stable across all species, organs and treatments studied.

conclusionsThis first in-depth study of reference genes validation in wild Arachis species will allow the use of specific combinations of secure and stable reference genes in qRT-PCR assays. The use of these appropriate references characterized here should improve the accuracy and reliability of gene expression analysis in both wild and cultivated Arachis and contribute for the better understanding of gene expression in, for instance, stress tolerance/resistance mechanisms in plants.

Identifiers

PMID21906295
PMCPMC3180468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.