Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21906278›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2011

Recruitment activities for a nationwide, population-based, group-randomized trial: the VA MI-Plus study.

Ellen Funkhouser, Deborah A Levine, Joe K Gerald, Thomas K Houston, Nancy K Johnson, Jeroan J Allison, Catarina I Kiefe

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00126750 (MI-Plus), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00126750 nacompletednot on this map

MI-Plus: Web-enhanced Guideline Implementation for Post MI CBOC Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUS Department of Veterans AffairsRan2003 to 2010Enrolled847ConditionsMyocardial Infarction, ComorbidityArmsVA MI Plus Interactive
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Enrolling Family Participants in a Statewide Implementation Trial of an Evidence-Based Treatment.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ellen FunkhouserVA Research Enhancement Award Program (REAP), Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA. emfunk@uab.edu
Deborah A Levine
Joe K Gerald
Thomas K Houston
Nancy K Johnson
Jeroan J Allison
Catarina I Kiefe
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USBirmingham VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCEUL1RR031982 · NCRR · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SULLIVAN, JOHN LEWIS · 2010 to 2011
$6.8M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR031982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Veterans Health Administration (VHA) oversees the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States. The feasibility of a large-scale, nationwide, group-randomized implementation trial of VHA outpatient practices has not been reported. We describe the recruitment and enrollment of such a trial testing a clinician-directed, Internet-delivered intervention for improving the care of postmyocardial infarction patients with multiple comorbidities.

methodsWith a recruitment goal of 200 eligible community-based outpatient clinics, parent VHA facilities (medical centers) were recruited because they oversee their affiliated clinics and the research conducted there. Eligible facilities had at least four VHA-owned and -operated primary care clinics, an affiliated Institutional Review Board (IRB), and no ongoing, potentially overlapping, quality-improvement study. Between December 2003 and December 2005, in two consecutive phases, we used initial and then intensified recruitment strategies.

resultsOverall, 48 of 66 (73%) eligible facilities were recruited. Of the 219 clinics and 957 clinicians associated with the 48 facilities, 168 (78%) clinics and 401 (42%) clinicians participated. The median time from initial facility contact to clinic enrollment was 222 days, which decreased by over one-third from the first to the second recruitment phase (medians: 323 and 195 days, respectively; p < .001), when more structured recruitment with physician recruiters was implemented and a dedicated IRB manager was added to the coordinating center staff.

conclusionsLarge group-randomized trials benefit from having dedicated physician investigators and IRB personnel involved in recruitment. A large-scale, nationally representative, group-randomized trial of community-based clinics is feasible within the VHA or a similar national healthcare system.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAmbulatory CareHumansInternetMyocardial InfarctionOutpatient Clinics, HospitalTime FactorsUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID21906278
PMCPMC3184080
OpenAlexW2127085587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.