Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21906199›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2012

Delay discounting by adolescents experimenting with cigarette smoking.

Brady Reynolds, Sherecce Fields

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A systematic review and meta-analysis of delay discounting and cannabis use.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Applying Behavioral Economics to Improve Adolescent and Young Adult Health: A Developmentally-Sensitive Approach.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Will delay discounting predict intention to quit smoking?Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2017
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Impulsivity and Stress Response in Nondependent Smokers (Tobacco Chippers) in Comparison to Heavy Smokers and Nonsmokers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brady ReynoldsResearch Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 43205, USA. Reynolds.421@osu.edu
Sherecce Fields

Funding

Impulsivity at Different Stages of Adolescent SmokingR21DA020423 · NIDA · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI REYNOLDS, BRADY A · 2006 to 2007
$384k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA020423NIDA NIH HHS R21DA020423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate delay discounting and self-reported impulsive behavior in a sample of adolescents experimenting with cigarette smoking compared with adolescents who had never smoked or were daily smokers.

designA cross-sectional design was used to compare smoking-status groups.

settingColumbus, Ohio, a city of approximately 780,000 people.

participantsA sample of 141 male and female adolescents with a mean age of 15.37 (standard deviation = 1.09) years. MEASUREMENTS: Primary measures included a computerized assessment of delay discounting, a self-report assessment of impulsivity [Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-adolescent (BIS-11-A)] and verifications of cigarette smoking status (breath carbon monoxide and urinary cotinine level).

findingsSmokers discounted more by delay and had higher impulsivity scores than non-smokers. Experimenters had scores intermediate to those of smokers and non-smokers on both measures. In some analyses the difference between experimenters and non-smokers was significant, with experimenters showing greater delay discounting, but in no case did experimenters differ significantly from the smokers.

conclusionsYoung people who experiment with cigarettes appear to be similar to those who smoke regularly in terms of tendency to discount future gains and report impulsive tendencies, and generally higher in these traits than non-smokers.

Indexed as

AdolescentArea Under CurveCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMaleOhioPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRisk FactorsSmokingTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID21906199
PMCPMC3260343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.