Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21905114›Full record

ArticleProteins2011

Prechemistry versus preorganization in DNA replication fidelity.

B Ram Prasad, Arieh Warshel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The entropic contributions in vitamin B12 enzymes still reflect the electrostatic paradigm.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Why nature really chose phosphate.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B Ram PrasadDepartment of Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.
Arieh Warshel
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Mechanistic Analysis of Pol Beta and Cancer-Associated MutantsU19CA105010 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GOODMAN, MYRON · 2004 to 2012
$9.8M
THEORETICAL STUDIES OF ENZYMATIC REACTIONSR01GM024492 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI WARSHEL, ARIEH · 1985 to 2017
$5.0M
NCI NIH HHS 1U19CA105010NCI NIH HHS U19 CA105010NIGMS NIH HHS GM024492NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM024492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular origin of nucleotide insertion catalysis and fidelity of DNA polymerases is explored by means of computational simulations. Special attention is paid to the examination of the validity of proposals that invoke prechemistry effects, checkpoints concepts, and dynamical effects. The simulations reproduce the observed fidelity in Pol β, starting with the relevant observed X-ray structures of the complex with the right (R) and wrong (W) nucleotides. The generation of free energy surfaces for the R and W systems also allowed us to analyze different proposals about the origin of the fidelity and to reach several important conclusions. It is found that the potential of mean force (PMF) obtained by proper sampling does not support QM/MM-based proposals of a large barrier before the prechemistry state. Furthermore, examination of dynamical proposals by the renormalization approach indicates that the motions from open to close configurations do not contribute to catalysis or fidelity. Finally we discuss and analyze the induced fit concept and show that, despite its importance, it does not explain fidelity. That is, the fidelity is apparently due to the change in the preorganization of the chemical site, as a result of the relaxation of the binding site upon binding of the incorrect nucleotide. Finally and importantly, since the issue is the barrier associated with the enzyme-substrate (ES)/DNA complex at the chemical transition state and not the path to this complex formation (unless this path involves rate determining steps), it is also not useful to invoke checkpoints while discussing fidelity.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase betaDNA ReplicationNucleotidesProtonsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase betaNucleotidesProtons

Identifiers

PMID21905114
PMCPMC3172682
OpenAlexW2104219402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.