Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21904945›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2012

Randomized controlled trial of health maintenance reminders provided directly to patients through an electronic PHR.

Adam Wright, Eric G Poon, Jonathan Wald, Joshua Feblowitz, Justine E Pang, Jeffrey L Schnipper, Richard W Grant, Tejal K Gandhi, Lynn A Volk, Amy Bloom and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Adult patient access to electronic health records.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  10. Patients' online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic review in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Effectiveness of Using Personal Health Records to Improve Recommended Breast Cancer Screening and Reduce Racial and Geographic Disparities Among Women.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adam WrightBrigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. awright5@partners.org
Eric G Poon
Jonathan Wald
Joshua Feblowitz
Justine E Pang
Jeffrey L Schnipper
Richard W Grant
Tejal K Gandhi
Lynn A Volk
Amy Bloom
Deborah H Williams
Kate Gardner
Marianna Epstein
Lisa Nelson
Alex Businger
Qi Li
David W Bates
Blackford Middleton
Mass General Brigham · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01-HS013660-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProvider and patient reminders can be effective in increasing rates of preventive screenings and vaccinations. However, the effect of patient-directed electronic reminders is understudied.

objectiveTo determine whether providing reminders directly to patients via an electronic Personal Health Record (PHR) improved adherence to care recommendations.

designWe conducted a cluster randomized trial without blinding from 2005 to 2007 at 11 primary care practices in the Partners HealthCare system.

participantsA total of 21,533 patients with access to a PHR were invited to the study, and 3,979 (18.5%) consented to enroll.

interventionsPatients in the intervention arm received health maintenance (HM) reminders via a secure PHR "eJournal," which allowed them to review and update HM and family history information. Patients in the active control arm received access to an eJournal that allowed them to input and review information related to medications, allergies and diabetes management. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was adherence to guideline-based care recommendations. KEY

resultsIntention-to-treat analysis showed that patients in the intervention arm were significantly more likely to receive mammography (48.6% vs 29.5%, p = 0.006) and influenza vaccinations (22.0% vs 14.0%, p = 0.018). No significant improvement was observed in rates of other screenings. Although Pap smear completion rates were higher in the intervention arm (41.0% vs 10.4%, p < 0.001), this finding was no longer significant after excluding women's health clinics. Additional on-treatment analysis showed significant increases in mammography (p = 0.019) and influenza vaccination (p = 0.015) for intervention arm patients who opened an eJournal compared to control arm patients, but no differences for any measure among patients who did not open an eJournal.

conclusionsProviding patients with HM reminders via a PHR may be effective in improving some elements of preventive care.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Records, PersonalReminder SystemsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID21904945
PMCPMC3250545
OpenAlexW1980762000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.