Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21904868›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2011

Selection and constraint on regulatory elements in Drosophila simulans.

Tami Cruickshank, Phil Nista

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tami CruickshankDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 E. 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN, USA. tcruicks@indiana.edu
Phil Nista
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We utilized available Drosophila simulans molecular population genomic data to characterize sequence polymorphism in noncoding regulatory regions and their corresponding transcribed target genes or interacting transcription factors. We highlight two properties of regulatory evolution. First, we find that sequence divergence between D. melanogaster and D. simulans is greater at regulatory sites than expected from levels of intraspecific polymorphism, suggestive of positive selection. Second, we compared variation in cis-regulatory regions to that of the transcription factors and transcribed target genes with which they are associated. We find a correlation in polymorphism between cis-regulatory regions and the transcription factors which they bind, but not between cis-regulatory regions and the physically neighboring target genes which they directly regulate. This result indicates that the evolution of cis-regulatory elements is constrained by the interactions among transcription factors and regulatory regions. More broadly, these findings support the general importance of noncoding regulatory DNA in evolution.

Indexed as

Regulatory Elements, TranscriptionalSelection, GeneticAnimalsBinding SitesDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEvolution, MolecularGene Expression RegulationGenes, InsectLinkage DisequilibriumPolymorphism, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNATranscription FactorsDrosophila ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21904868
OpenAlexW2058275984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.