Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21904603›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Dietary α-eleostearic acid ameliorates experimental inflammatory bowel disease in mice by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ.

Stephanie N Lewis, Lera Brannan, Amir J Guri, Pinyi Lu, Raquel Hontecillas, Josep Bassaganya-Riera, David R Bevan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anticancer activity ofAmerican journal of translational research · 2025
    Article
  2. Polymers · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Nutritional protective mechanisms against gut inflammation.The Journal of nutritional biochemistry · 2013
    Review
  11. Preventive and prophylactic mechanisms of action of pomegranate bioactive constituents.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Journal of natural science, biology, and medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie N LewisGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Computational Biology Program, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America. snl@vt.edu
Lera Brannan
Amir J Guri
Pinyi Lu
Raquel Hontecillas
Josep Bassaganya-Riera
David R Bevan
Virginia Tech · US

Funding

VT Initiative for Maximizing Student DiversityR25GM072767 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI SMITH, EDWARD J · 2007 to 2021
$6.9M
Mechanisms of Immune Modulation by Abscisic AcidR01AT004308 · NCCIH · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BASSAGANYA-RIERA, JOSEP · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
Virtual Screening Development to Complement Experimental Screening for PPAR ModulF31DK091186 · NIDDK · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI LEWIS, STEPHANIE N · 2011 to 2012
$84k
NCCIH NIH HHS 5R01AT4308NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT004308NIDDK NIH HHS F31 DK091186NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM072767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are modestly effective and associated with side effects from prolonged use. As there is no known cure for IBD, alternative therapeutic options are needed. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARγ) has been identified as a potential target for novel therapeutics against IBD. For this project, compounds were screened to identify naturally occurring PPARγ agonists as a means to identify novel anti-inflammatory therapeutics for experimental assessment of efficacy. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsHere we provide complementary computational and experimental methods to efficiently screen for PPARγ agonists and demonstrate amelioration of experimental IBD in mice, respectively. Computational docking as part of virtual screening (VS) was used to test binding between a total of eighty-one compounds and PPARγ. The test compounds included known agonists, known inactive compounds, derivatives and stereoisomers of known agonists with unknown activity, and conjugated trienes. The compound identified through VS as possessing the most favorable docked pose was used as the test compound for experimental work. With our combined methods, we have identified α-eleostearic acid (ESA) as a natural PPARγ agonist. Results of ligand-binding assays complemented the screening prediction. In addition, ESA decreased macrophage infiltration and significantly impeded the progression of IBD-related phenotypes through both PPARγ-dependent and -independent mechanisms in mice with experimental IBD. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study serves as the first significant step toward a large-scale VS protocol for natural PPARγ agonist screening that includes a massively diverse ligand library and structures that represent multiple known target pharmacophores.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineInflammatory Bowel DiseasesLinolenic AcidsMicePPAR gammaReal-Time Polymerase Chain Reactioneleostearic acidLinolenic AcidsPPAR gamma

Identifiers

PMID21904603
PMCPMC3164124
OpenAlexW2095483449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.