Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21903731›Full record

ReviewGenome biology and evolution2011

Roles of mutation and selection in speciation: from Hugo de Vries to the modern genomic era.

Masatoshi Nei, Masafumi Nozawa

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology and evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Values of molecular markers in the differential diagnosis of thyroid abnormalities.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Decoding mechanisms by which silent codon changes influence protein biogenesis and function.The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masatoshi NeiInstitute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics and Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University. nxm2@psu.edu
Masafumi Nozawa

Funding

THEORETICAL POPULATION GENETICS AND ITS APPLICATIONSR01GM020293 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI NEI, MASATOSHI · 1985 to 2009
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM020293NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM020293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most important problems in evolutionary biology is to understand how new species are generated in nature. In the past, it was difficult to study this problem because our lifetime is too short to observe the entire process of speciation. In recent years, however, molecular and genomic techniques have been developed for identifying and studying the genes involved in speciation. Using these techniques, many investigators have already obtained new findings. At present, however, the results obtained are complex and quite confusing. We have therefore attempted to understand these findings coherently with a historical perspective and clarify the roles of mutation and natural selection in speciation. We have first indicated that the root of the currently burgeoning field of plant genomics goes back to Hugo de Vries, who proposed the mutation theory of evolution more than a century ago and that he unknowingly found the importance of polyploidy and chromosomal rearrangements in plant speciation. We have then shown that the currently popular Dobzhansky-Muller model of evolution of reproductive isolation is only one of many possible mechanisms. Some of them are Oka's model of duplicate gene mutations, multiallelic speciation, mutation-rescue model, segregation-distorter gene model, heterochromatin-associated speciation, single-locus model, etc. The occurrence of speciation also depends on the reproductive system, population size, bottleneck effects, and environmental factors, such as temperature and day length. Some authors emphasized the importance of natural selection to speed up speciation, but mutation is crucial in speciation because reproductive barriers cannot be generated without mutations.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationMutationSelection, GeneticAnimalsDrosophilaEvolution, MolecularFemaleFungiGeneticsGenomicsHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyMagnoliopsidaModels, GeneticReproduction

Identifiers

PMID21903731
PMCPMC3227404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.