ArticleBMC family practice2011
Why do GPs hesitate to refer diabetes patients to a self-management education program: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC family practice, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient and provider acceptance of telecoaching in type 2 diabetes: a mixed-method study embedded in a randomised clinical trial.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Trial
- Article
- Factors associated with self-management in older adults with multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Current evidence for designing self-management support for underserved populations: an integrative review using the example of diabetes.International journal for equity in health · 2023Review
- Team-Based Diabetes Care in Ontario and Hong Kong: a Comparative Review.Current diabetes reports · 2023Review
- Scale-up of a chronic care model-based programme for type 2 diabetes in Belgium: a mixed-methods study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Understanding Drivers of Resistance Toward Implementation of Web-Based Self-Management Tools in Routine Cancer Care Among Oncology Nurses: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Estimate General Practitioners Active Supply in Iran: Capture-Recapture Method for Three Data Sources.Iranian journal of public health · 2019Article
- Requirements for implementing online information material for patients with low back pain in general practice: an interview study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2019Article
- Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Engagement in Diabetes Self-management Education Among People With Diabetes in the United States.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974) · 2018Article
- Characteristics of patients with diabetes who accept referrals for care management services.SAGE open medicine · 2016Article
- Factors influencing the adoption of self-management solutions: an interpretive synthesis of the literature on stakeholder experiences.Implementation science : IS · 2015Review
- Patient experiences with self-monitoring renal function after renal transplantation: results from a single-center prospective pilot study.Patient preference and adherence · 2015Article
- Implementation of a self-management support approach (WISE) across a health system: a process evaluation explaining what did and did not work for organisations, clinicians and patients.Implementation science : IS · 2014Article
- Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support: Referral and Attendance at a Patient-Centered Medical Home.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelf-management support is seen as a cornerstone of good diabetes care and many countries are currently engaged in initiatives to integrate self-management support in primary care. Concerning the organisation of these programs, evidence is growing that engagement of health care professionals, in particular of GPs, is critical for successful application. This paper reports on a study exploring why a substantial number of GPs was (initially) reluctant to refer patients to a self-management education program in Belgium.
methodsQualitative analysis of semi-structured face-to-face interviews with a purposive sample of 20 GPs who were not regular users of the service. The Greenhalgh diffusion of innovation framework was used as background and organising framework.
resultsSeveral barriers, linked to different components of the Greenhalgh model, emerged from the interview data. One of the most striking ones was the limited readiness for innovation among GPs. Feelings of fear of further fragmentation of diabetes care and frustration and insecurity regarding their own role in diabetes care prevented them from engaging in the innovation process. GPs needed time to be reassured that the program respects their role and has an added value to usual care. Once GPs considered referring patients, it was not clear enough which of their patients would benefit from the program. Some GPs expressed the need for training in motivational skills, so that they could better motivate their patients to participate. A practical but often mentioned barrier was the distance to the centre where the program was delivered. Further, uncertainty about continuity interfered with the uptake of the offer.
conclusionsThe study results contribute to a better understanding of the reasons why GPs hesitate to refer patients to a self-management education program. First of all, the role of GPs and other health care providers in diabetes care needs to be clarified before introducing new functions. Feelings of security and a basic trust of providers in the health system are a prerequisite for participation in care innovation. Moreover, some important lessons regarding the implementation of an education program in primary care have been learned from the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.