Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21902372›Full record

ArticlePhysical review letters2011

Dynamics of DNA replication in yeast.

Renata Retkute, Conrad A Nieduszynski, Alessandro de Moura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review letters, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. DNA replication timing.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Mathematical modeling of genome replication.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics · 2012
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Renata RetkuteCentre for Genetics and Genomics, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Conrad A Nieduszynski
Alessandro de Moura

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E023754/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G001596/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB-G010722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a mathematical model for the spatial dynamics of DNA replication. Using this model we determine the probability distribution for the time at which each chromosomal position is replicated. From this we show, contrary to previous reports, that mean replication time curves cannot be used to directly determine origin parameters. We demonstrate that the stochastic nature of replication dynamics leaves a clear signature in experimentally measured population average data, and we show that the width of the activation time probability distribution can be inferred from this data. Our results compare favorably with experimental measurements in Saccharomyces cerevisae.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationChromosomes, FungalDNA, FungalDNA Replication TimingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID21902372
PMCPMC3671325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.