Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21902288›Full record

SynthesisDrugs in R&D2011

Short-term acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) use for pain, fever, or colds - gastrointestinal adverse effects: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Angel Lanas, Denis McCarthy, Michael Voelker, Andreas Brueckner, Stephen Senn, John A Baron

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs in R&D, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. The 125th Anniversary of Aspirin-The Story Continues.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. SeqTrial: Utility Preserving Sequential Clinical Trial Data Generator.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gastrointestinal symptoms in low-dose aspirin users: a comparison between plain and buffered aspirin.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Efficacy and gastrointestinal risk of aspirin used for the treatment of pain and cold.Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Angel LanasUniversity of Zaragoza Medical School, Aragn Health Research Institute (IIS Aragn), CIBERehd, Zaragoza, Spain. alanas@unizar.es
Denis McCarthy
Michael Voelker
Andreas Brueckner
Stephen Senn
John A Baron
Bayer (United States) · USUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimAcetylsalicylic acid (ASA [aspirin]) is a commonly used over-the-counter drug for the treatment of pain, fever, or colds, but data on the safety of this use are very limited. The aim of this study was to provide data on the safety of this treatment pattern, which is of interest to clinicians, regulators, and the public.

methodsA meta-analysis of individual patient data from 67 studies sponsored by Bayer HealthCare was completed. The primary endpoints were patient-reported gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs); the secondary endpoints were the incidence of patient-reported non-GI AEs. Event incidence and odds ratios (ORs) based on Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel estimates are reported. In total, 6181 patients were treated with ASA, 3515 with placebo, 1145 with acetaminophen (paracetamol), and 754 with ibuprofen. Exposure to ASA was short term (82.5% of patients had a single dose).

resultsGI AEs were more frequent with ASA (9.9%) than with placebo (9.0%).[OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1, 1.5]. Dyspeptic symptoms were infrequent (4.6% in placebo subjects). The ORs for ASA were 1.3 (95% CI 1.1, 1.6) versus placebo; 1.55 (95% CI 0.7, 3.3) versus ibuprofen; and 1.04 (95% CI 0.8, 1.4) versus acetaminophen. There were very few serious GI AEs (one ASA case; three placebo cases). No differences were found for non-GI AEs and no cases of cerebral hemorrhage were reported.

conclusionShort-term, mostly single-dose exposure to ASA for the treatment of pain, fever, or colds was associated with a small but significant increase in the risk of dyspepsia relative to placebo. No serious GI complications were reported.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirinCommon ColdDouble-Blind MethodDyspepsiaFemaleFeverGastrointestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal TractHumansIbuprofenMaleOdds RatioPainAcetaminophenAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirinIbuprofenPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID21902288
PMCPMC3586117
OpenAlexW1984785416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.