SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011
Foam dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers: public health and clinical implications - a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2022Pooled it
- Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Hydrocolloid dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Alginate dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Systematic review and mixed treatment comparison: dressings to heal diabetic foot ulcers.Diabetologia · 2012Pooled it
- The effectiveness of hydrocolloid dressings versus other dressings in the healing of pressure ulcers in adults and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista latino-americana de enfermagemPooled it
- Colonizing microbiota is associated with clinical outcomes in diabetic wound healing.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2023Review
- Debridement of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.Advances in wound care · 2022Review
- Using Case-Based Reasoning in a Learning System: A Prototype of a Pedagogical Nurse Tool for Evidence-Based Diabetic Foot Ulcer Care.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022Article
- Assessment of Simple Bedside Wound Characteristics for a Prediction Model for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Outcomes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021Article
- Management of infected diabetic wound: a scoping review of guidelines.F1000Research · 2019Article
- Models Used in Clinical Decision Support Systems Supporting Healthcare Professionals Treating Chronic Wounds: Systematic Literature Review.JMIR diabetes · 2018Review
- Seeking effective interventions to treat complex wounds: an overview of systematic reviews.BMC medicine · 2015Review
- Literature review on the management of diabetic foot ulcer.World journal of diabetes · 2015Review
- Transdermal deferoxamine prevents pressure-induced diabetic ulcers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
- Curbing Inflammation in Skin Wound Healing: A Review.International journal of inflammation · 2015Review
- Clinical Impact Upon Wound Healing and Inflammation in Moist, Wet, and Dry Environments.Advances in wound care · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFoot ulcers in people with diabetes are a prevalent and serious global health issue. Dressings form a key part of ulcer treatment, with clinicians and patients having many different types to choose from. A clear and current overview of current evidence is required to facilitate decision-making regarding dressing use.
objectivesThe review aimed to evaluate the effects of foam wound dressings on the healing of foot ulcers in people with diabetes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 10 June 2011); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 2); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to June Week 1 2011); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, 8 June, 2011); Ovid EMBASE (1980 to 2011 Week 22); EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 3 June 2011). There were no restrictions based on language or date of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects on ulcer healing of one or more foam wound dressings in the treatment of foot ulcers in people with diabetes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction. MAIN
resultsWe included six studies (157 participants) in this review. Meta analysis of two studies indicated that foam dressings do not promote the healing of diabetic foot ulcers compared with basic wound contact dressings (RR 2.03, 95%CI 0.91 to 4.55). Pooled data from two studies comparing foam and alginate dressing found no statistically significant difference in ulcer healing (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.44). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of diabetic foot ulcers healed when foam dressings were compared with hydrocolloid (matrix) dressings. All included studies were small and/or had limited follow-up times. AUTHORS'
conclusionsCurrently there is no research evidence to suggest that foam wound dressings are more effective in healing foot ulcers in people with diabetes than other types of dressing however all trials in this field are very small. Decision makers may wish to consider aspects such as dressing cost and the wound management properties offered by each dressing type e.g. exudate management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.