A paper, made visible
Interventions for latent autoimmune diabetes (LADA) in adults.
Abstract evidence3 comparisonsAutomated source matching · not expert reviewed
Partial coverage · gaps are marked inside each comparison
- Some results can be visualized; unassessed context remains visible.
Choose a comparison
3 comparisons · Each follows its own evidence.
What happened? insulin compared with SU
One comparison, followed all the way through
insulin compared with SU
stimulated C-peptide
1
Follow the study
What was examined
insulin
Outcome named in the source
stimulated C-peptide
The study design is not ready to draw
- Comparison-level assignment evidence has not been extracted.
2
Reported difference
mean difference
← Lower reported valueHigher reported value →
stimulated C-peptide7.7 ng/ml 2.9 to 12.5 ng/ml
No difference12.5
Reported estimate95% confidence interval
The interval lies above no difference. This shows the direction under the reported model, not proof that the study is free of bias.
The confidence interval describes statistical uncertainty under the model, not every possible source of error.
4
Read the source context
The source behind this result.
The excerpt can discuss several outcomes or treatments. It is source context, not a reviewed conclusion about this single comparison.
Read reported excerpt
No intervention influenced fasting C-peptide, but insulin maintained stimulated C-peptide better than SU (one study, mean difference 7.7 ng/ml (95% CI 2.9 to 12.5)).
Automated source matching has not been reviewed by a scientific expert. This comparison's assignment method is not established.
5
Keep the limits in view
Study-specific limitations have not been assessed
- An empty limitations list does not mean the study has no limitations.
Inspect the source trail for this comparison
- Paper abstract ↗ · Abstractabstract · Matched to source text; not expert scientific review
No intervention influenced fasting C-peptide, but insulin maintained stimulated C-peptide better than SU (one study, mean difference 7.7 ng/ml (95% CI 2.9 to 12.5)).