Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21901698›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

Pressure-relieving devices for treating heel pressure ulcers.

Elizabeth McGinnis, Nikki Stubbs

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Reactive air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth McGinnisLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, c/o 2nd Floor Stable Block, Old Trust HQ, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George St, Leeds, UK, LS1 3EX.
Nikki Stubbs
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPressure ulcers are areas of localised damage to the skin and underlying tissue caused by pressure or shear. Pressure redistribution devices are used as part of the treatment to reduce the pressure on the ulcer. The anatomy of the heel and the susceptibility of the foot to vascular disease mean that pressure ulcers located there require a particular approach to pressure relief.

objectivesTo determine the effects of pressure-relieving interventions for treating pressure ulcers on the heel. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 25 March 2011); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 1); Ovid MEDLINE (1948 to March Week 3 2011); Ovid EMBASE (1980 to 2011 Week 12);Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations March 29, 2011); and EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 25 March 2011). We applied no language or publication date restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of pressure-relieving devices on the healing of pressure ulcers of the heel. Participants were treated in any care setting. Interventions were any pressure-relieving devices including mattresses and specific heel devices. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both review authors independently reviewed titles and abstracts and selected studies for inclusion. Both review authors independently extracted data and assessed studies for risk of bias. MAIN

resultsOne study met the inclusion criteria. This study (141 participants) compared two mattress systems however losses to follow up were too great to permit reliable conclusions. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThis review identified one small study at moderate to high risk of bias which provided no evidence to inform practice. More research is needed.

Indexed as

Bedding and LinensBedsHeelAged, 80 and overFoot UlcerHumansOrthotic DevicesPatient DropoutsPressure UlcerRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID21901698
OpenAlexW4237754153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.