Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21901443›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2011

MercNet: a national monitoring network to assess responses to changing mercury emissions in the United States.

David Schmeltz, David C Evers, Charles T Driscoll, Richard Artz, Mark Cohen, David Gay, Richard Haeuber, David P Krabbenhoft, Robert Mason, Kristi Morris and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mercury source changes and food web shifts alter contamination signatures of predatory fish from Lake Michigan.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Purification of HgEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Observations of mercury wet deposition in Mexico.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2013
    Article
  10. Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effects.Environmental science & technology · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

David SchmeltzClean Air Markets Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Washington, DC 20460, USA. schmeltz.david@epa.gov
David C Evers
Charles T Driscoll
Richard Artz
Mark Cohen
David Gay
Richard Haeuber
David P Krabbenhoft
Robert Mason
Kristi Morris
James G Wiener
Environmental Protection Agency · USBiodiversity Research Institute · USCarnegie Hall · USNational Atmospheric Deposition ProgramNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · USNational Park Service · USNOAA Air Resources Laboratory · USUnited States Geological Survey · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Wisconsin–La Crosse · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A partnership of federal and state agencies, tribes, industry, and scientists from academic research and environmental organizations is establishing a national, policy-relevant mercury monitoring network, called MercNet, to address key questions concerning changes in anthropogenic mercury emissions and deposition, associated linkages to ecosystem effects, and recovery from mercury contamination. This network would quantify mercury in the atmosphere, land, water, and biota in terrestrial, freshwater, and coastal ecosystems to provide a national scientific capability for evaluating the benefits and effectiveness of emission controls. Program development began with two workshops, convened to establish network goals, to select key indicators for monitoring, to propose a geographic network of monitoring sites, and to design a monitoring plan. MercNet relies strongly on multi-institutional partnerships to secure the capabilities and comprehensive data that are needed to develop, calibrate, and refine predictive mercury models and to guide effective management. Ongoing collaborative efforts include the: (1) development of regional multi-media databases on mercury in the Laurentian Great Lakes, northeastern United States, and eastern Canada; (2) syntheses and reporting of these data for the scientific and policy communities; and (3) evaluation of potential monitoring sites. The MercNet approach could be applied to the development of other monitoring programs, such as emerging efforts to monitor and assess global mercury emission controls.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelAtmosphereEnvironmental MonitoringLakesMercuryMethylmercury CompoundsRisk AssessmentUnited StatesWater Pollutants, ChemicalMercuryMethylmercury CompoundsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID21901443
OpenAlexW2069559829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.