ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2012
Natriuretic peptides in therapy for decompensated heart failure.
Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteomic Markers of Aging and Longevity: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Atrial Natriuretic Peptide: Structure, Function, and Physiological Effects: A Narrative Review.Current cardiology reviews · 2021Review
- New therapies for the treatment of heart failure: a summary of recent accomplishments.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2019Review
- Atrial natriuretic peptide and renal dopaminergic system: a positive friendly relationship?BioMed research international · 2014Review
- Novel vasodilators in heart failure.Current heart failure reports · 2013Review
- A novel bioassay for the activity determination of therapeutic human brain natriuretic peptide (BNP).PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congestive heart failure (CHF) is the most frequent cause of hospitalization for patients >65 years of age and continues to be a major public health burden among the ageing population. Unlike therapy for chronic CHF, there has been only modest progress in medical treatment for acutely decompensated CHF over the past several decades. Moreover, current treatment-consisting generally of diuretic, inotropic, and vasodilatory agents-is associated with many limitations in clinical practice. Natriuretic peptides provide a promising mechanism of action in the pathophysiologic background for CHF treatment based on their vasodilatory and diuretic properties and effective inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, which is activated early in the course of CHF. Nesiritide (Natrecor® or Noratak®) is a recombinant natriuretic peptide that has the same 32 amino-acid sequence as human B-type natriuretic peptide. Nesiritide has been shown to improve dyspnea and hemodynamic parameters in patients with decompensated heart failure. Ularitide is a synthetic form of urodilatin, a natriuretic peptide hormone secreted by the kidney. Recent clinical studies suggest that ularitide may play a role in managing decompensated heart failure. This review provides an update on natriuretic peptides and their therapeutic potential in advanced CHF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.