Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21901093›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2011

Histo-blood group antigens act as attachment factors of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus infection in a virus strain-dependent manner.

Kristina Nyström, Ghislaine Le Gall-Reculé, Paola Grassi, Joana Abrantes, Nathalie Ruvoën-Clouet, Beatrice Le Moullac-Vaidye, Ana M Lopes, Pedro J Esteves, Tanja Strive, Stéphane Marchandeau and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Characterisation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Serological characterisation ofJournal of veterinary research · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Anti-Glycan Autoantibodies Induced byFrontiers in immunology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Kristina NyströmINSERM, U892, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Ghislaine Le Gall-Reculé
Paola Grassi
Joana Abrantes
Nathalie Ruvoën-Clouet
Beatrice Le Moullac-Vaidye
Ana M Lopes
Pedro J Esteves
Tanja Strive
Stéphane Marchandeau
Anne Dell
Stuart M Haslam
Jacques Le Pendu
Imperial College London · GBInserm · FRCentro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos GenéticosCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUInstituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária · PTNantes Université · FROffice National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabbit Hemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV), a calicivirus of the Lagovirus genus, and responsible for rabbit hemorrhagic disease (RHD), kills rabbits between 48 to 72 hours post infection with mortality rates as high as 50-90%. Caliciviruses, including noroviruses and RHDV, have been shown to bind histo-blood group antigens (HBGA) and human non-secretor individuals lacking ABH antigens in epithelia have been found to be resistant to norovirus infection. RHDV virus-like particles have previously been shown to bind the H type 2 and A antigens. In this study we present a comprehensive assessment of the strain-specific binding patterns of different RHDV isolates to HBGAs. We characterized the HBGA expression in the duodenum of wild and domestic rabbits by mass spectrometry and relative quantification of A, B and H type 2 expression. A detailed binding analysis of a range of RHDV strains, to synthetic sugars and human red blood cells, as well as to rabbit duodenum, a likely gastrointestinal site for viral entrance was performed. Enzymatic cleavage of HBGA epitopes confirmed binding specificity. Binding was observed to blood group B, A and H type 2 epitopes in a strain-dependent manner with slight differences in specificity for A, B or H epitopes allowing RHDV strains to preferentially recognize different subgroups of animals. Strains related to the earliest described RHDV outbreak were not able to bind A, whereas all other genotypes have acquired A binding. In an experimental infection study, rabbits lacking the correct HBGA ligands were resistant to lethal RHDV infection at low challenge doses. Similarly, survivors of outbreaks in wild populations showed increased frequency of weak binding phenotypes, indicating selection for host resistance depending on the strain circulating in the population. HBGAs thus act as attachment factors facilitating infection, while their polymorphism of expression could contribute to generate genetic resistance to RHDV at the population level.

Indexed as

AnimalsAustraliaBlood Group AntigensCaliciviridae InfectionsDNA, ViralDuodenumEpitopesHemagglutination, ViralHemorrhagic Disease Virus, RabbitImmunohistochemistryMass SpectrometryPhenotypePhylogenyProtein BindingRabbitsBlood Group AntigensDNA, ViralEpitopes

Identifiers

PMID21901093
PMCPMC3161982
OpenAlexW1988135890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.