Trial reportJournal of biomechanics2011
Limits of recovery against slip-induced falls while walking.
Trial report in Journal of biomechanics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generalization of treadmill-slip training to prevent a fall following a sudden (novel) slip in over-ground walking.Journal of biomechanics · 2013Trial
- Differential Cortical Activations Among Young Adults Who Fall Versus Those Who Recover Successfully Following an Unexpected Slip During Walking.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- The role of the ankle plantar flexor muscles in trip recovery during walking: a computational modeling study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Slip-induced fall-risk assessment based on regular gait pattern in older adults.Journal of biomechanics · 2019Article
- Limb Collapse or Instability? Assessment on Cause of Falls.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2019Article
- Lower extremity kinematics during forward heel-slip.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2019Article
- Neuromuscular determinants of slip-induced falls and recoveries in older adults.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
- Neural Mechanisms Involved in Mental Imagery of Slip-Perturbation While Walking: A Preliminary fMRI Study.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2018Article
- An ecologically-controlled exoskeleton can improve balance recovery after slippage.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Can stability really predict an impending slip-related fall among older adults?Journal of biomechanics · 2014Article
- Loss of balance during balance beam walking elicits a multifocal theta band electrocortical response.Journal of neurophysiology · 2013Article
- Contributions of muscles to mediolateral ground reaction force over a range of walking speeds.Journal of biomechanics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Slip-induced falls in gait often have devastating consequences. The purposes of this study were 1) to select the determinants that can best discriminate the outcomes (recoveries or falls) of an unannounced slip induced in gait (and to find their corresponding threshold, i.e., the limits of recovery, which can clearly separate these two outcomes), and 2) to verify these results in a subset of repeated-slip trials. Based on the data collected from 69 young subjects during a slip induced in gait, nine different ways of combining the center of mass (COM) stability, the hip height, and its vertical velocity were investigated with the aid of logistic regression. The results revealed that the COM stability (s) and limb support (represented by the quotient of hip vertical velocity to hip height, S(hip)) recorded at the instant immediately prior to the recovery step touchdown were sufficiently sensitive to account for all (100%) variance in falls, and specific enough to account for nearly all (98.3%) variability in recoveries. This boundary (S(hip)=-0.22s-0.25), which quantifies the risk of falls in the stability-limb support quotient (s-S(hip)) domain, was fully verified using second-slip and third-slip trials (n=76) with classification of falls at 100% and recoveries at 98.6%. The severity of an actual fall is likely to be greater further below the boundary, while the likelihood of a fall diminishes above it. Finally, the slope of the boundary also indicates the tradeoff between the stability and limb support, whereby high stability can compensate for the insufficiency in limb support, or vice versa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.