Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21899790›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2013

Breakfast consumption and daily physical activity in 9-10-year-old British children.

Pauline A J Vissers, Andy P Jones, Kirsten Corder, Amy Jennings, Esther M F van Sluijs, Ailsa Welch, Aedin Cassidy, Simon Griffin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Understanding differences between summer vs. school obesogenic behaviors of children: the structured days hypothesis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pauline A J VissersSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Andy P Jones
Kirsten Corder
Amy Jennings
Esther M F van Sluijs
Ailsa Welch
Aedin Cassidy
Simon Griffin

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council MC_U106179474Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/7Wellcome Trust 087636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the association between breakfast consumption and physical activity in a well-characterised sample of English children.

designCross-sectional study using food diaries to record breakfast consumption and accelerometry to assess physical activity.

settingNorfolk county, England. SUBJECTS: Children (n 1697) aged 9–10 years from the SPEEDY (Sport, Physical Activity and Eating behaviour: Environmental Determinants in Young people) study.

resultsBoyswho consumed a poor-quality breakfast based on dairy product, cereal and fruit intakes spent approximately 7 min more time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) during weekday afternoons and evenings compared with those who did not consume breakfast (P,0?05). On weekend days, boys who consumed a poor- or good-quality breakfast spent approximately 6 and 5min less time respectively being sedentary during the mornings compared with breakfast nonconsumers (P,0?05). Boys who consumed a good-quality breakfast spent almost 3min more in MVPA during the morning on weekend days compared with nonconsumers, and boys who consumed a poor- or good-quality breakfast were 22% and 16% more active overall respectively than breakfast non-consumers (P,0?05). During the rest of the day, boys who consumed a good-quality breakfast spent about 11 min less time being sedentary (P,0?05) and 7minmore time in MVPA (P,0?01).

conclusionsAlthough some associations between breakfast consumption and physical activity were detected for boys, the present study does not provide strong evidence that failing to consume breakfast, or having a low energy intake at breakfast time, is detrimental to children’s physical activity levels.

Indexed as

BreakfastMotor ActivityWhite PeopleAnthropometryChildCross-Sectional StudiesDiet RecordsEnergy IntakeEnglandFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMultilevel AnalysisRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID21899790
PMCPMC3667735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.