ArticleBMC research notes2011
Conservative treatment of fractures of the clavicle.
Article in BMC research notes, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliability of measurements of the fractured clavicle: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Does clavicular shortening after nonoperative treatment of midshaft fractures affect shoulder function? A systematic review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Correlation of the degree of clavicle shortening after non-surgical treatment of midshaft fractures with upper limb function.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2015Trial
- Clinical and Radiological Outcome Assessment following Coracoclavicular Reconstruction with Endobutton and Fibertape for Neer's Type II Lateral End Clavicle Fracture: A Prospective Study.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- Functional Outcomes in Surgically Treated Clavicle Fractures: A Longitudinal Observational Study.Cureus · 2023Article
- Assessment of the measurement methods in midshaft clavicle fracture.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Comparative Study of Postoperative Outcomes of Clavicle Midshaft Fracture Treated by Nailing vs. Plating.Cureus · 2022Article
- Operative stabilisation versus non-operative management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures.SICOT-J · 2022Article
- Epidemiology of Clavicle Fractures Sustained at a Colorado Ski Resort.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- Midshaft Clavicle Fractures Treated Nonoperatively Using Figure-of-Eight Bandage: Are Fracture Type, Shortening, and Displacement Radiographic Predictors of Failure?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle.JSES international · 2020Article
- Shoulder and Elbow Fractures in Athletes.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2019Review
- Does candidate for plate fixation selection improve the functional outcome after midshaft clavicle fracture? A systematic review of 1348 patients.Shoulder & elbow · 2019Review
- Midshaft clavicle fractures: Current concepts.EFORT open reviews · 2018Article
- Management of mid-shaft clavicular fractures: comparison between non-operative treatment and plate fixation in 60 patients.Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction · 2017Article
- Measurement of Clavicle Fracture Shortening Using Computed Tomography and Chest Radiography.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2016Article
- Comparison of treatment of fracture midshaft clavicle in adults by external fixator with conservative treatment.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2014Article
- Preferences of orthopedic surgeons for treating midshaft clavicle fracture in adults.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the treatment of clavicle fractures, the choice of procedure depends on the possibility of restoring the anatomical functional integrity of the shoulder.
methodsWe examined 71 patients (51 males and 20 females, mean age 38.9 years) who were affected by clavicle fracture sequelae. Demographic and clinical data and the site of the lesion were recorded for each partecipant. The dissatisfaction of the patient was determined by the presence of 1 or more affirmative answers on the Simple Shoulder Test. The Constant Shoulder Score was also included in the functional and clinical exams. We measured the length of the healthy clavicle and the previously fractured clavicle, and we expressed the difference in length in mm and in percentage shortening. We then examined the correlations between the shortening of the bone and the clinical and functional outcomes of the patients.
resultsSixty patients had a lesion of the diaphysis, 8 patients had a lesion of the lateral third of the clavicle, and 3 patients had a lesion of the medial third of the clavicle. The mean Constant Shoulder Score was 77.9, and 51 of the 71 patients were satisfied with their treatment. Radiography showed a mean clavicle shortening of 10 mm (mean percentage 6.5%). In the 20 dissatisfied patients, the mean clavicle shortening was 15.2 mm (9.7%). In these patients, we found a highly significant association between dissatisfaction with treatment and the amount of bone shortening, (p < 0.0001), as well as with a diaphyseal location (p < 0.05) and with the female sex (p = 0.004). No other variable related to the patient, the type of treatment or the fracture characteristics correlated with the treatment outcome.
conclusionsIn the literature, measurements of the shortening of the bone segment following a fracture range between 15 and 23 mm, and marked shortening is correlated with the failure of conservative treatment. However, these data need to be reinterpreted in light of the physiological variability of the clavicle length, which ranges from 140 to 158 mm in the healthy population. Shortening of the bone by more than 9.7% should be the cut-off for predicting failure of conservative treatment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.