Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21898697›Full record

ArticleStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2011

Site-specific recombinase strategy to create induced pluripotent stem cells efficiently with plasmid DNA.

Marisa Karow, Christopher L Chavez, Alfonso P Farruggio, Jonathan M Geisinger, Annahita Keravala, W Edward Jung, Feng Lan, Joseph C Wu, Yanru Chen-Tsai, Michele P Calos

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Microneedle systems for delivering nucleic acid drugs.Journal of pharmaceutical investigation · 2022
    Review
  4. Application of iPSC to Modelling of Respiratory Diseases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marisa KarowDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5120, USA.
Christopher L Chavez
Alfonso P Farruggio
Jonathan M Geisinger
Annahita Keravala
W Edward Jung
Feng Lan
Joseph C Wu
Yanru Chen-Tsai
Michele P Calos
Stanford University · US

Funding

GENETICS TRAINING PROGRAM FOR PHD CANDIDATEST32GM007790 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRUNET, ANNE, KINGSLEY, DAVID M · 1985 to 2020
$12.8M
09: Inducing Pluripotency with MiRNAs: New Paradigm Shif in Cell ReprogrammingDP2OD004437 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WU, JOSEPH C. · 2008 to 2008
$2.4M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS DP20D004437NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007790NIH HHS DP2 OD004437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have revolutionized the stem cell field. iPSCs are most often produced by using retroviruses. However, the resulting cells may be ill-suited for clinical applications. Many alternative strategies to make iPSCs have been developed, but the nonintegrating strategies tend to be inefficient, while the integrating strategies involve random integration. Here, we report a facile strategy to create murine iPSCs that uses plasmid DNA and single transfection with sequence-specific recombinases. PhiC31 integrase was used to insert the reprogramming cassette into the genome, producing iPSCs. Cre recombinase was then used for excision of the reprogramming genes. The iPSCs were demonstrated to be pluripotent by in vitro and in vivo criteria, both before and after excision of the reprogramming cassette. This strategy is comparable with retroviral approaches in efficiency, but is nonhazardous for the user, simple to perform, and results in nonrandom integration of a reprogramming cassette that can be readily deleted. We demonstrated the efficiency of this reprogramming and excision strategy in two accessible cell types, fibroblasts and adipose stem cells. This simple strategy produces pluripotent stem cells that have the potential to be used in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAnimalsBlotting, SouthernCells, CulturedCellular ReprogrammingDNA NucleotidyltransferasesInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsMicePlasmidsPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA NucleotidyltransferasesSite-specific recombinase

Identifiers

PMID21898697
PMCPMC3466168
OpenAlexW2145920583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.