Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2011
Denosumab and changes in bone turnover markers during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.
Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00089674 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate AMG 162 in the Treatment of Bone Loss in Subjects Undergoing Androgen-Deprivation Therapy for Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate AMG 162 in the Treatment of Bone Loss in Subjects Undergoing Androgen-Deprivation Therapy for Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Randomized Phase 1 Study Comparing the PK, PD, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Proposed Biosimilar RGB-14-X and Denosumab in Healthy Adult Males.Clinical and translational science · 2026Trial
- Denosumab as an immune modulator in HER2-negative early breast cancer: results of the window-of-opportunity D-BIOMARK clinical trial.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Trial
- Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the denosumab biosimilar FKS518 and reference denosumab in healthy subjects: the Lumiade-1 study.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- Biomarkers of bone metabolism in [EJNMMI research · 2024Article
- Review
- Bone turnover biomarkers identify unique prognostic risk groups in men with castration resistant prostate cancer and skeletal metastases: Results from SWOG S0421.Cancer treatment and research communications · 2018Article
- Safety and efficacy of radium-223 dichloride in Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases.International journal of clinical oncology · 2017Article
- Bone metastasis: the importance of the neighbourhood.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2016Review
- The Present and Future of Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer: Proteomics, Genomics, and Immunology Advancements.Biomarkers in cancer · 2016Review
- Antiresorptive therapy in the management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss.Current osteoporosis reports · 2015Review
- Future of bisphosphonates and denosumab for men with advanced prostate cancer.Cancer management and research · 2014Review
- Male osteoporosis: A review.World journal of orthopedics · 2012Article
- Management of bone metastases in refractory prostate cancer--role of denosumab.Clinical interventions in aging · 2012Review
- Treatment-induced bone loss and fractures in cancer patients undergoing hormone ablation therapy: efficacy and safety of denosumab.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer increases fracture risk, decreases bone mineral density, and increases bone turnover markers (BTMs) including serum type 1 C-telopeptide (sCTX), tartrate-resistant alkaline phosphatase 5b (TRAP-5b), and procollagen-1 N-terminal telopeptide (P1NP). In a prespecified exploratory analysis of a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind study, we evaluated the effects of denosumab (60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months for 3 years) versus placebo (1468 patients, 734 in each group) on BTM values. BTMs were measured at baseline, month 1, and predose at months 6, 12, 24, and 36 in the overall population. BTMs at month 1 are also reported for subgroups based on age (< 70 years versus ≥ 70 years), prior duration of ADT (≤ 6 months versus > 6 months), and baseline BTM (≤ median versus > median BTM values). Treatment with denosumab provided a rapid and sustained decrease of BTM values compared with placebo. The median change in sCTX levels at month 1 was -90% in the denosumab group and -3% in the placebo group (p < 0.0001). The median change in TRAP-5b levels at month 1 was -55% in the denosumab group and -3% in the placebo group (p < 0.0001). The maximal median change in P1NP was -64% in the denosumab group and -11% in the placebo group, (p < 0.0001). Significantly greater decreases in BTM for denosumab were also seen in subgroup analyses based on age, prior ADT treatment, and baseline BTM values. Suppression of bone turnover markers was consistent with marked increases in bone mineral density reported previously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.