Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21898375›Full record

ArticleCancer2012

Phase 1 trial of everolimus plus sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Ana M Molina, Darren R Feldman, Martin H Voss, Michelle S Ginsberg, Michael S Baum, Dion R Brocks, Patricia M Fischer, Michael J Trinos, Sujata Patil, Robert J Motzer

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Phase II Trial and Correlative Genomic Analysis of Everolimus Plus Bevacizumab in Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Trial
  7. A phase I/II study of lenalidomide in combination with sunitinib in patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2014
    Trial
  8. Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana M MolinaMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA. molinaa@mskcc.org
Darren R Feldman
Martin H Voss
Michelle S Ginsberg
Michael S Baum
Dion R Brocks
Patricia M Fischer
Michael J Trinos
Sujata Patil
Robert J Motzer
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · USUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Training Program (ICTTP)T32CA009207 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Omar Abdel-Wahab, Alexander Drilon · 1985 to 2026
$13.7M
Summer research experiences for medical students supervised by faculty mentorsR25CA020449 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Charlotte Eielson Ariyan · 1985 to 2026
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA020449NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimultaneous inhibition of the vascular epithelial growth factor (VEGF) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway may improve treatment response in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Everolimus, an oral mTOR inhibitor, and sunitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGF, are standard agents in the management of metastatic RCC.

methodsSequential cohorts of 3 to 6 patients with advanced RCC received dose-escalated combinations of sunitinib (37.5 or 50 mg daily, 4 weeks on/2 weeks off) with everolimus (2.5-5 mg daily or 20-30 mg weekly). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed in the first 6-week cycle to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained.

resultsTwenty patients (13 clear cell and 7 nonclear cell RCC) were enrolled in 5 cohorts. Daily everolimus was not tolerated when combined with sunitinib; the first 2 patients on the second cohort suffered DLTs. With weekly everolimus, the MTD was 30 mg everolimus on days 7, 14, 21, and 28, plus 37.5 mg sunitinib on days 1 to 28 of a 42-day cycle; however, chronic treatment was associated with grade 3 and 4 toxicities. A schedule of 20 mg everolimus weekly/37.5 mg sunitinib was tolerated as chronic therapy. Five patients (25%) had confirmed partial responses, and 3 had nonclear cell RCC. No unexpected accumulation of everolimus, sunitinib, or N-desethyl sunitinib was observed.

conclusionsThe combination of everolimus and sunitinib is associated with significant acute and chronic toxicities and is only tolerated at attenuated doses. Responses were observed in nonclear cell and clear cell RCC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Renal CellEverolimusFemaleHumansIndolesKidney NeoplasmsMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedPyrrolesSirolimusSunitinibEverolimusIndolesPyrrolesSirolimusSunitinib

Identifiers

PMID21898375
PMCPMC3609026
OpenAlexW2035240798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.