Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21898173›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2012

Differential effects of the adenosine A₂A agonist CGS-21680 and haloperidol on food-reinforced fixed ratio responding in the rat.

Chris Jones-Cage, Thomas R Stratford, David Wirtshafter

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Sensitivity to cognitive effort mediates psychostimulant effects on a novel rodent cost/benefit decision-making task.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chris Jones-CageCollege of the Desert, 43-500 Monterey Avenue, Palm Desert, CA 92260, USA.
Thomas R Stratford
David Wirtshafter
University of Illinois Chicago · USCollege of the Desert · US

Funding

Nucleus Accumbens-Mediated Feeding: Output PathwaysR01DK071738 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI STRATFORD, THOMAS R · 2007 to 2010
$1.1M
Lateral Hypothalamus, Dopamine and Ingestive BehaviorR03DA020802 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI WIRTSHAFTER, DAVID · 2006 to 2007
$153k
NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA020802NIDA NIH HHS R03DA020802NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK071738NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK071738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePrevious studies have shown that adenosine A(2A) receptors are colocalized with dopamine D(2) receptors on striatal neurons. Activation of these two receptors has antagonistic effects under a number of conditions suggesting that stimulation of adenosine A(2A) receptors may have behavioral effects resembling those produced by blockade of dopamine D(2) receptors, but this possibility has been investigated in a limited number of situations.

objectiveWe compared the effects of the adenosine A(2A) agonist CGS-21680 and the preferential D(2) dopamine antagonist haloperidol in a situation in which dopamine blockade produces a distinctive pattern of behavioral effects. MATERIALS AND

methodsSix rats were trained to lever press for food reward on a fixed ratio 15 schedule of reinforcement and then tested after being injected with various doses of CGS-21680 (0.064, 0.128, and 0.25 mg/kg) and haloperidol (0.25 and 0.1 mg/kg).

resultsHaloperidol produced a dose-dependent suppression of lever pressing with mean response rates declining across the duration of the test session. CGS-21680 also produced a dose-dependent suppression of responding, but this effect was not temporally graded, and responding was equivalently suppressed across the duration of the session. Additionally, CGS-21680 increased post-reinforcement pause duration to a much greater extent than did haloperidol.

conclusionsOn this task, the behavioral effects of CGS-21680 do not resemble those produced by haloperidol. Several explanations of this discrepancy are possible, the most likely being that the observed behavioral effects of CGS-21680 result from an action at a site other than D(2) receptor-expressing striatal neurons.

Indexed as

AdenosineAdenosine A2 Receptor AgonistsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalConditioning, OperantDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHaloperidolMalePhenethylaminesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReinforcement ScheduleReward2-(4-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino)-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosineAdenosineAdenosine A2 Receptor AgonistsDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsHaloperidolPhenethylamines

Identifiers

PMID21898173
PMCPMC3505378
OpenAlexW2026598376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.