Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21898137›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurology2012

Levetiracetam versus lorazepam in status epilepticus: a randomized, open labeled pilot study.

U K Misra, J Kalita, P K Maurya

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04926844 (Effectiveness of Combined Levetiracetam and Midazolam in Treatment of Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04926844 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Combined Levetiracetam and Midazolam in Treatment of Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorSohag UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled144ConditionsStatus Epilepticus, Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus, Status Epilepticus, Generalized, Status Epilepticus, Generalized ConvulsiveArmsLevetiracetam, Midazolam, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Anticonvulsant therapy for status epilepticus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Treatment considerations for the management of neonatal onset seizures.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Treatment of Refractory and Super-refractory Status Epilepticus.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018
    Review
  20. Antiepileptic drugs in critically ill patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

U K MisraDepartment of Neurology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareily Road, Lucknow 226014, India. drukmisra@rediffmail.com
J Kalita
P K Maurya
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the management of status epilepticus (SE), lorazepam (LOR) is recommended as the first and phenytoin or fosphenytoin as the second choice. Both these drugs have significant toxicity. Intravenous levetiracetam (LEV) has become available, but its efficacy and safety has not been reported in comparison to LOR. We report a randomized, open labeled pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of LEV and LOR in SE. Consecutive patients with convulsive or subtle convulsive SE were randomized to LEV 20 mg/kg IV over 15 min or LOR 0.1 mg/kg over 2-4 min. Failure to control SE within 10 min of administration of one study drug was treated by the other study drug. The primary endpoint was clinical seizure cessation and secondary endpoints were 24 h freedom from seizure, hospital mortality, and adverse events. Our results are based on 79 patients. Both LEV and LOR were equally effective. In the first instance, the SE was controlled by LEV in 76.3% (29/38) and by LOR in 75.6% (31/41) of patients. In those resistant to the above regimen, LEV controlled SE in 70.0% (7/10) and LOR in 88.9% (8/9) patients. The 24-h freedom from seizure was also comparable: by LEV in 79.3% (23/29) and LOR in 67.7% (21/31). LOR was associated with significantly higher need of artificial ventilation and insignificantly higher frequency of hypotension. For the treatment of SE, LEV is an alternative to LOR and may be preferred in patients with respiratory compromise and hypotension.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnticonvulsantsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLevetiracetamLorazepamMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPiracetamStatus EpilepticusAnticonvulsantsLevetiracetamLorazepamPiracetam

Identifiers

PMID21898137
OpenAlexW2086981442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.