Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2012
Toll-like receptors in the inflammatory response during open and laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer.
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inflammation and Stem Cell Stochasticity of HPV-induced Cervical Cancer: Epigenetics based Biomarkers through Microbiome and Metabolome for Personalized Medicine: A Systematic Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of laparoscopic versus open surgery on humoral immunity in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of C-Reactive Protein for Infectious Complications in Laparoscopic Versus Open Colorectal Surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Influences of laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy on serum interleukin-6 levels in patients with gastric cancer among Asian populations: a systematic review.BMC gastroenterology · 2015Pooled it
- Oxidative stress markers in laparoscopic versus open colectomy for cancer: a double-blind randomized study.Surgical endoscopy · 2013Trial
- Role of Interleukins in Inflammation-Mediated Tumor Immune Microenvironment Modulation in Colorectal Cancer Pathogenesis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Review
- Laparoscopic-Assisted Colorectal Resection Can Reduce the Inhibition of Immune Function Compared with Conventional Open Surgery: A Retrospective Clinical Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of clinical and pathological outcomes.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022Review
- Laparoscopic Radical Resection versus Routine Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Hemocoagulative post-operative changes after laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery: the role of lupus anticoagulant.Updates in surgery · 2020Article
- The Role of Interleukins in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of biological sciences · 2020Review
- Laparoscopic Surgery Within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocol Reduced Postoperative Ileus by Increasing Postoperative Treg Levels in Patients with Right-Side Colon Carcinoma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Article
- Implicating anaesthesia and the perioperative period in cancer recurrence and metastasis.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2018Review
- Host responses to concurrent combined injuries in non-human primates.Journal of inflammation (London, England) · 2017Article
- Surgical stress response after colorectal resection: a comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery.Techniques in coloproctology · 2015Article
- Toll-like receptor signaling in colorectal cancer: carcinogenesis to cancer therapy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Immune response after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: a review.Gastroenterology report · 2013Article
- The role of TLRs in cervical cancer with HPV infection: a review.Signal transduction and targeted therapyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical interventions activate a cascade of reactions that result in an aseptic inflammatory reaction. This inflammatory response initiates the organism's innate immunity. Laparoscopic surgery reduces the trauma, and patients benefit from diminished surgical trauma and maintained immune function. Cytokine levels and C-reactive protein (CRP) are related to the magnitude of surgical trauma and surgical stress. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) 2 and 4 are the first sensor-recognition receptors of the invading pathogens for the innate immune response. This study aimed to compare the inflammatory response and then the stress response during laparoscopic and open colectomy for cancer by calculating TLR-2 and TLR-4 as the first sensor-recognition receptors together with interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP).
methodsA total 40 patients with colorectal cancer were randomized in two groups: group A (open colectomy, n = 20) and group B (laparoscopic colectomy, n = 20). An epidural catheter was placed in all patients 1 h preoperatively. Rupivocaine was administered perioperatively and 48 h postoperatively. Blood samples were taken for calculation of IL-6, TNF-α, hsCRP, TLR-2, and TLR-4 preoperatively and 5 min after deflation of pneumoperitoneum (group B) or 5 min after division of the colon (group A), then 6 and 24 h postoperatively.
resultsThe mean operative time was 115 for group A and 142 min for group B. The mean blood loss was respectively 240 and 105 ml (P < 0.001), and the mean hospital stay was respectively 8 and 5 days (P < 0.05). The IL-6 level was significant higher in group A than in group B at 6 and 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.0001), and the hsCRP level was significant higher in group A than in group B at 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.001). The TNF-α values did not differ between the two groups. The TLR-2 level was significantly higher in group A than in group B at 5 min (P = 0.013) and 24 h (P = 0.007) postoperatively. The TLR-4 level was significant higher in group A than in group B at 5 min postoperatively (P = 0.03).
conclusionThe inflammatory response and the resultant stress response are significantly less during laparoscopic colectomy than during open colectomy for colorectal cancer. This is an obvious short-term clinical benefit for the patient, providing tinder for further study to investigate the long-term results of laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy for colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.