Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21897256›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in rheumatology2011

Systemic sclerosis and the heart: current diagnosis and management.

Chintan S Desai, Daniel C Lee, Sanjiv J Shah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in rheumatology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Troponin I levels in systemic sclerosis patients with myocardial involvement.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Sclerodermic Cardiomyopathy-A State-of-the-Art Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Detection ofSAGE open medical case reports · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Update on the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Imaging in Diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chintan S DesaiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Daniel C Lee
Sanjiv J Shah
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Study of Cardiac Mechanics in Systemic HypertensionR01HL107577 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SHAH, SANJIV J · 2011 to 2019
$4.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL107577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWhen present clinically, cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a major risk factor for death. It is therefore vitally important to understand the epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment of the cardiac manifestations of SSc. RECENT

findingsThe epidemiology of cardiac involvement in SSc has been the subject of several recent studies. Most importantly, the prevalence of overt left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and its associated risk factors have been defined, and patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc appear to be most susceptible to direct cardiac involvement. From a diagnostic and screening standpoint, tissue Doppler echocardiography and natriuretic peptides have provided fresh insight into subclinical cardiac dysfunction in SSc. Newer techniques, such as speckle-tracking echocardiography, diffuse myocardial fibrosis imaging, and absolute myocardial perfusion imaging, are poised to further advance our knowledge. Lastly, there is now consistent observational data to suggest a central role for calcium channel blockers in the treatment of microvascular ischemia and prevention of overt LV systolic dysfunction, although randomized controlled trials are lacking. SUMMARY: Recent studies have improved our understanding of cardiac involvement in SSc. Nevertheless, key questions regarding screening, diagnosis, and treatment remain. Novel diagnostic techniques and multicenter studies should yield important new data, which will hopefully ultimately result in improved outcomes.

Indexed as

BiomarkersEchocardiographyHeart DiseasesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsRisk FactorsScleroderma, SystemicTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray ComputedVentricular Dysfunction, RightBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)

Identifiers

PMID21897256
PMCPMC3678364
OpenAlexW1998917694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.