ArticleNucleic acids research2012
How environmental solution conditions determine the compaction velocity of single DNA molecules.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein crowders remodel RNA electrostatics, hydration, and dynamics: a challenge to steric crowding models.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Review
- Macromolecular Crowding and DNA: Bridging the Gap between In Vitro and In Vivo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Optical Polymorphism of Liquid-Crystalline Dispersions of DNA at High Concentrations of Crowding Polymer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Gold Nanosystems Covered with Doxorubicin/DNA Complexes: A Therapeutic Target for Prostate and Liver Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Molecular ring toss of circular BAC DNA using micropillar array for single-molecule studies.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
- Compaction of Single-Molecule Megabase-Long Chromatin under the Influence of Macromolecular Crowding.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- Crowding Induces Entropically-Driven Changes to DNA Dynamics That Depend on Crowder Structure and Ionic Conditions.Frontiers in physics · 2018Article
- Article
- Development of polymeric-cationic peptide composite nanoparticles, a nanoparticle-in-nanoparticle system for controlled gene delivery.International journal of nanomedicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the mechanisms of DNA compaction is becoming increasingly important for gene therapy and nanotechnology DNA applications. The kinetics of the compaction velocity of single DNA molecules was studied using two non-protein condensation systems, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) with Mg(2+) for the polymer-salt-induced condensation system and spermine for the polyamine condensation system. The compaction velocities of single tandem λ-DNA molecules were measured at various PEG and spermine concentrations by video fluorescent microscopy. Single DNA molecules were observed using a molecular stretching technique in the microfluidic flow. The results show that the compaction velocity of a single DNA molecule was proportional to the PEG or spermine concentration to the power of a half. Theoretical considerations indicate that the compaction velocity is related to differences in the free energy of a single DNA molecule between the random coil and compacted states. In the compaction kinetics with PEG, acceleration of the compaction velocity occurred above the overlap concentration while considerable deceleration occurred during the coexistence state of the random coil and the compacted conformation. This study demonstrates the control factors of DNA compaction kinetics and contributes toward the understanding of the compaction mechanisms of non-protein DNA interactions as well as DNA-protein interactions in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.