Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21896611›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2011

Effectiveness of adenoidectomy in children with recurrent upper respiratory tract infections: open randomised controlled trial.

M T A van den Aardweg, C W B Boonacker, M M Rovers, A W Hoes, A G M Schilder

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Improving pain management in childhood acute otitis media in general practice: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a GP-targeted educational intervention.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Changes in healthcare utilisation for paediatric tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in the Netherlands: a population-based study.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A Review and Outcome of Adenoidectomy Performed in Resource Limited Settings.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M T A van den AardwegDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Netherlands.
C W B Boonacker
M M Rovers
A W Hoes
A G M Schilder
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLWilhelmina Children's Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of adenoidectomy in children with recurrent upper respiratory tract infections.

designOpen randomised controlled trial.

setting11 general hospitals and two academic centres.

participants111 children aged 1-6 with recurrent upper respiratory tract infections selected for adenoidectomy.

interventionA strategy of immediate adenoidectomy with or without myringotomy or a strategy of initial watchful waiting. Main outcome measure Primary outcome measure: number of upper respiratory tract infections per person year calculated from data obtained during the total follow-up (maximum 24 months). SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: days with upper respiratory tract infection per person year, middle ear complaints with fever in episodes and days, days with fever, prevalence of upper respiratory tract infections, and health related quality of life.

resultsDuring the median follow-up of 24 months, there were 7.91 episodes of upper respiratory tract infections per person year in the adenoidectomy group and 7.84 in the watchful waiting group (difference in incidence rate 0.07, 95% confidence interval -0.70 to 0.85). No relevant differences were found for days of upper respiratory tract infections and middle ear complaints with fever in episodes and days, nor for health related quality of life. The prevalence of upper respiratory tract infections decreased over time in both groups. Children in the adenoidectomy group had significantly more days with fever than the children in the watchful waiting group. Two children had complications related to surgery.

conclusionIn children selected for adenoidectomy for recurrent upper respiratory tract infections, a strategy of immediate surgery confers no clinical benefits over a strategy of initial watchful waiting. Trial registration Dutch Trial Register NTR968: ISRCTN03720485.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdenoidectomyChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFeverFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMaleRespiratory Tract InfectionsSecondary PreventionTreatment OutcomeWatchful Waiting

Identifiers

PMID21896611
PMCPMC3167877
OpenAlexW2125632702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.