Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21896543›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2012

Cost comparison of axillary sentinel lymph node detection and axillary lymphadenectomy in early breast cancer. A national study based on a prospective multi-institutional series of 985 patients 'on behalf of the Group of Surgeons from the French Unicancer Federation'.

J M Classe, S Baffert, B Sigal-Zafrani, M Fall, C Rousseau, S Alran, P Rouanet, C Belichard, H Mignotte, G Ferron and 21 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Positive nonsentinel lymph nodes are associated with poor survival in breast cancer: results from a retrospective study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Utilization of sentinel lymph node biopsy for uterine cancer.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The role of general nuclear medicine in breast cancer.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

J M ClasseSurgical Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-Center Gauducheau, Nantes. Electronic address: jm-classe@nantes.fnclcc.fr.
S BaffertMedico economic unit, Institut Curie, Paris.
B Sigal-ZafraniPathology Department, Institut Curie, Paris.
M FallMedico economic unit, Institut Curie, Paris.
C RousseauNuclear medicine Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-Center Gauducheau, Nantes.
S AlranSurgical Department, Institut Curie, Paris.
P RouanetSurgical Department, Center Val d'Aurel Montpellier.
C BelichardSurgical Department, Center René Huguenin, Saint Cloud.
H MignotteSurgical Department, Center Léon Bérard, Lyon.
G FerronSurgical Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse.
F MarchalSurgical Department, Center Alexis Vautrin, Nancy.
S GiardSurgical Department, Center Oscar Lambret, Lille.
C Tunon de LaraSurgical Department, Center Bergonié, Bordeaux.
G Le BouedecSurgical Department, Center Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand.
J CuisenierSurgical Department, Center Georges François Leclerc, Dijon.
R WernerSurgical Department, Center Jean Godinot, Reims.
I RaoustSurgical Department, Center Georges Lacassagne, Nice.
J-F RodierSurgical Department, Center Paul Strauss, Strasbourg.
F LakiMedico economic unit, Institut Curie, Paris; Surgical Department, Institut Curie, Paris.
P-E ColomboSurgical Department, Center Val d'Aurel Montpellier.
S LasrySurgical Department, Center René Huguenin, Saint Cloud.
C FaureSurgical Department, Center Léon Bérard, Lyon.
H CharitanskySurgical Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse.
J-B OlivierSurgical Department, Center Alexis Vautrin, Nancy.
M-P ChauvetSurgical Department, Center Oscar Lambret, Lille.
E BussièresSurgical Department, Center Bergonié, Bordeaux.
P GimberguesSurgical Department, Center Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand.
B FlipoSurgical Department, Center Georges Lacassagne, Nice.
G HouvenaeghelSurgical Department, Institut Paoli Calmette Marseille, France.
F DravetSurgical Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-Center Gauducheau, Nantes.
A LivartowskiMedico economic unit, Institut Curie, Paris.
Institut Curie · FRInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FRCentre Jean Perrin · FRCentre Léon Bérard · FRCentre Oscar Lambret · FRHôpital René Huguenin · FRInstitut Bergonié · FRInstitut Claudius Regaud · FRCentre Georges François Leclerc · FRInstitut Jean Godinot · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRLevi Strauss (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur objective was to assess the global cost of the sentinel lymph node detection [axillary sentinel lymph node detection (ASLND)] compared with standard axillary lymphadenectomy [axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)] for early breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted a prospective, multi-institutional, observational, cost comparative analysis. Cost calculations were realized with the micro-costing method from the diagnosis until 1 month after the last surgery.

resultsEight hundred and thirty nine patients were included in the ASLND group and 146 in the ALND group. The cost generated for a patient with an ASLND, with one preoperative scintigraphy, a combined method for sentinel node detection, an intraoperative pathological analysis without lymphadenectomy, was lower than the cost generated for a patient with lymphadenectomy [€ 2947 (σ = 580) versus € 3331 (σ = 902); P = 0.0001].

conclusionASLND, involving expensive techniques, was finally less expensive than ALND. The length of hospital stay was the cost driver of these procedures. The current observational study points the heterogeneous practices for this validated and largely diffused technique. Several technical choices have an impact on the cost of ASLND, as intraoperative analysis allowing to reduce rehospitalization rate for secondary lymphadenectomy or preoperative scintigraphy, suggesting possible savings on hospital resources.

Indexed as

AgedAlgorithmsAxillaBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaCosts and Cost AnalysisDisease ProgressionFemaleFranceGeneral SurgeryHumansLength of StayLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMedical Oncology

Identifiers

PMID21896543
PMCPMC3335244
OpenAlexW2152408630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.