Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21896284›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2011

Tonic and phasic release of glutamate and acetylcholine neurotransmission in sub-regions of the rat prefrontal cortex using enzyme-based microelectrode arrays.

Catherine E Mattinson, Jason J Burmeister, Jorge E Quintero, Francois Pomerleau, Peter Huettl, Greg A Gerhardt

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diverse Spatiotemporal Scales of Cholinergic Signaling in the Neocortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine E MattinsonDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Morris K. Udall Parkinson's Disease Research Center of Excellence, University of Kentucky, 306 Davis Mills Building, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40536-0098, USA.
Jason J Burmeister
Jorge E Quintero
Francois Pomerleau
Peter Huettl
Greg A Gerhardt
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Training in Drug Abuse Related Research.T32DA016176 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DWOSKIN, LINDA P · 2004 to 2020
$4.0M
Neurochem Chip: Methodology to Study Untethered RatsR01DA017186 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI GERHARDT, GREG A. · 2003 to 2007
$2.0M
NIDA NIH HHS DA 017186NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017186NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA016176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is an area of the brain critical for higher cognitive processes and implicated in disorders of the CNS such as drug addiction, depression and schizophrenia. Glutamate and acetylcholine are neurotransmitters that are essential for cortical functioning, yet little is known about the dynamic function of these neurotransmitters in subregions of the mPFC. In these studies we used a novel microelectrode array technology to measure resting levels (tonic release) of glutamate and acetylcholine as well as KCl-evoked release (stimulated phasic release) in the mPFC of the anesthetized rat to further our understanding of both tonic and phasic neurotransmission in the cingulate cortex, prelimbic cortex, and infralimbic cortex of the mPFC. Studies revealed homogeneity of tonic and phasic signaling among brain subregions for each neurotransmitter. However, resting levels of glutamate were significantly higher as compared to acetylcholine levels in all subregions. Additionally, KCl-evoked acetylcholine release in the cingulate cortex (7.1 μM) was significantly greater than KCl-evoked glutamate release in any of the three subregions (Cg1, 2.9 μM; PrL, 2.0 μM; IL, 1.8 μM). Interestingly, the time for signal decay following KCl-evoked acetylcholine release was significantly longer by an average of 240% as compared to KCL-evoked glutamate release for all three brain subregions. Finally, we observed a negative relationship between acetylcholine resting levels and KCl-evoked release in the Cg1. These data suggest a homogenous distribution of both glutamatergic and acetylcholinergic innervation in the mPFC, with alterations in tonic and phasic release regulation accounting for differences between these neurotransmitters.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAnimalsElectrochemical TechniquesGlutamic AcidMaleMicroelectrodesPrefrontal CortexRatsRats, Inbred F344Synaptic TransmissionTime FactorsAcetylcholineGlutamic Acid

Identifiers

PMID21896284
PMCPMC3607211
OpenAlexW2001458880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.