ArticleImmunology2011
Eosinophils elicit proliferation of naive and fungal-specific cells in vivo so enhancing a T helper type 1 cytokine profile in favour of a protective immune response against Cryptococcus neoformans infection.
Article in Immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Lung-resident memory Th2 cells regulate pulmonary cryptococcosis by inducing type-II granuloma formation.Mucosal immunology · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prognostic prediction for hospitalized HIV/AIDS patients with cryptococcus infection in Guangxi, China.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Th1 cell immune response inMicrobiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Clinical features of invasive fungal disease in children with no underlying disease.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Inflammatory monocytes are detrimental to the host immune response during acute infection with Cryptococcus neoformans.PLoS pathogens · 2019Article
- The status of cryptococcosis in Latin America.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2018Review
- Immunology of Cryptococcal Infections: Developing a Rational Approach to Patient Therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
- Innate Immune Responses toJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- The Innate Immune Cross Talk between NK Cells and Eosinophils Is Regulated by the Interaction of Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors with Eosinophil Surface Ligands.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Article
- Eosinophils subvert host resistance to an intracellular pathogen by instigating non-protective IL-4 in CCR2Mucosal immunology · 2017Article
- The Regulatory Function of Eosinophils.Microbiology spectrum · 2016Review
- Innate host defenses against Cryptococcus neoformans.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2016Review
- Immunity to Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii during cryptococcosis.Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B · 2015Review
- Eosinophils and mast cells in leishmaniasis.Immunologic research · 2014Review
- Impact of surfactant protein D, interleukin-5, and eosinophilia on Cryptococcosis.Infection and immunity · 2014Article
- IL-23 dampens the allergic response to Cryptococcus neoformans through IL-17-independent and -dependent mechanisms.The American journal of pathology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Experimental Cryptococcus neoformans infection in rats has been shown to have similarities with human cryptococcosis, because as in healthy humans, rats can effectively contain cryptococcal infection. Moreover, it has been shown that eosinophils are components of the immune response to C. neoformans infections. In a previous in vitro study, we demonstrated that rat peritoneal eosinophils phagocytose opsonized live yeasts of C. neoformans, thereby triggering their activation, as indicated by the up-regulation of MHC and co-stimulatory molecules and the increase in interleukin-12, tumour necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ production. Furthermore, this work demonstrated that C. neoformans-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes cultured with these activated C. neoformans-pulsed eosinophils proliferated, and produced important amounts of T helper type 1 (Th1) cytokines in the absence of Th2 cytokine synthesis. In the present in vivo study, we have shown that C. neoformans-pulsed eosinophils are also able to migrate into lymphoid organs to present C. neoformans antigens, thereby priming naive and re-stimulating infected rats to induce T-cell and B-cell responses against infection with the fungus. Furthermore, the antigen-specific immune response induced by C. neoformans-pulsed eosinophils, which is characterized by the development of a Th1 microenvironment with increased levels of NO synthesis and C. neoformans-specific immunoglobulin production, was demonstrated to be able to protect rats against subsequent infection with fungus. In summary, the present work demonstrates that eosinophils act as antigen-presenting cells for the fungal antigen, hence initiating and modulating a C. neoformans-specific immune response. Finally, we suggest that C. neoformans-loaded eosinophils might participate in the protective immune response against these fungi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.