Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21895630›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2012

Small molecule chemokine mimetics suggest a molecular basis for the observation that CXCL10 and CXCL11 are allosteric ligands of CXCR3.

Belinda Nedjai, Hubert Li, Ilana L Stroke, Emma L Wise, Maria L Webb, J Robert Merritt, Ian Henderson, Anthony E Klon, Andrew G Cole, Richard Horuk and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. BaNDyT: Bayesian Network modeling of molecular Dynamics Trajectories.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Chemokines and Chemokine Receptors: Orchestrating Tumor Metastasization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The yin and yang of chemokine receptor activation.British journal of pharmacology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Belinda NedjaiLeukocyte Biology Section, NHLI Division, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK.
Hubert Li
Ilana L Stroke
Emma L Wise
Maria L Webb
J Robert Merritt
Ian Henderson
Anthony E Klon
Andrew G Cole
Richard Horuk
Nagarajan Vaidehi
James E Pease
United States Pharmacopeial Convention · USImperial College London · GBCity of Hope · USAnsys (United States) · USPrinceton University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 18303British Heart Foundation PG/08/031/24823Medical Research Council G1000758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe chemokine receptor CXCR3 directs migration of T-cells in response to the ligands CXCL9/Mig, CXCL10/IP-10 and CXCL11/I-TAC. Both ligands and receptors are implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory disorders, including atherosclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Here, we describe the molecular mechanism by which two synthetic small molecule agonists activate CXCR3. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: As both small molecules are basic, we hypothesized that they formed electrostatic interactions with acidic residues within CXCR3. Nine point mutants of CXCR3 were generated in which an acidic residue was mutated to its amide counterpart. Following transient expression, the ability of the constructs to bind and signal in response to natural and synthetic ligands was examined. KEY

resultsThe CXCR3 mutants D112N, D195N and E196Q were efficiently expressed and responsive in chemotaxis assays to CXCL11 but not to CXCL10 or to either of the synthetic agonists, confirmed with radioligand binding assays. Molecular modelling of both CXCL10 and CXCR3 suggests that the small molecule agonists mimic a region of the '30s loop' (residues 30-40 of CXCL10) which interacts with the intrahelical CXCR3 residue D112, leading to receptor activation. D195 and E196 are located in the second extracellular loop and form putative intramolecular salt bridges required for a CXCR3 conformation that recognizes CXCL10. In contrast, CXCL11 recognition by CXCR3 is largely independent of these residues. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: We provide here a molecular basis for the observation that CXCL10 and CXCL11 are allosteric ligands of CXCR3. Such findings may have implications for the design of CXCR3 antagonists.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAllosteric SiteAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell LineChemokine CXCL10Chemokine CXCL11ChemotaxisCyclic AMPDNA, ComplementaryFlow CytometryHumansLigandsMiceModels, MolecularMolecular StructureChemokine CXCL10Chemokine CXCL11CXCL10 protein, humanCXCL11 protein, humanCXCR3 protein, humanCyclic AMPDNA, ComplementaryLigandsReceptors, CXCR3Small Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID21895630
PMCPMC3417418
OpenAlexW1854210175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.