ArticleDNA and cell biology2012
Escaping the cut by restriction enzymes through single-strand self-annealing of host-edited 12-bp and longer synthetic palindromes.
Article in DNA and cell biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Defragged Binary I Ching Genetic Code Chromosomes Compared to Nirenberg's and Transformed into Rotating 2D Circles and Squares and into a 3D 100% Symmetrical Tetrahedron Coupled to a Functional One to Discern Start From Non-Start Methionines through a Stella Octangula.Journal of proteome science and computational biology · 2012Article
- The Quantum Workings of the Rotating 64-Grid Genetic Code.NeuroQuantology : an interdisciplinary journal of neuroscience and quantum physics · 2011Article
- Most Used Codons per Amino Acid and per Genome in the Code of Man Compared to Other Organisms According to the Rotating Circular Genetic Code.NeuroQuantology : an interdisciplinary journal of neuroscience and quantum physics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Palindromati, the massive host-edited synthetic palindromic contamination found in GenBank, is illustrated and exemplified. Millions of contaminated sequences with portions or tandems of such portions derived from the ZAP adaptor or related linkers are shown (1) by the 12-bp sequence reported elsewhere, exon Xb, 5' CCCGAATTCGGG 3', (2) by a 22-bp related sequence 5' CTCGTGCCGAATTCGGCACGAG 3', and (3) by a longer 44-bp related sequence: 5' CTCGTGCCGAATTCGGCACGAGCTCGTGCCGAATTCGGCACGAG 3'. Possible reasons for why those long contaminating sequences continue in the databases are presented here: (1) the recognition site for the plus strand (+) is single-strand self-annealed; (2) the recognition site for the minus strand (-) is not only single-strand self-annealed but also located far away from the single-strand self-annealed plus strand, rendering impossible the formation of the active EcoRI enzyme dimer to cut on 5' G/AATTC 3', its target sequence. As a possible solution, it is suggested to rely on at least two or three independent results, such as sequences obtained by independent laboratories with the use, preferably, of independent sequencing methodologies. This information may help to develop tools for bioinformatics capable to detect/remove these contaminants and to infer why some damaged sequences which cause genetic diseases escape detection by the molecular quality control mechanism of cells and organisms, being undesirably transferred unchecked through the generations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.