Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21895049›Full record

ReviewHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2011

Modern clinical management of arterial hypertension: fixed or free combination therapies?

Giuliano Tocci, Massimo Volpe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Blood Pressure Target Achievement Under Monotheraphy: A Real-Life Appraisal.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Observational
  3. Comparison of Efficacies of Commonly Used Hypertension Treatment Modalities: A Retrospective Study of 1900 Participants in a Hypertension Clinic.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giuliano TocciDivision of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza, SantAndrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Massimo Volpe
Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood pressure control is a key element in any cardiovascular prevention strategy. However, it is also one of the least frequently achieved goals in modern strategies for the clinical management of cardiovascular diseases, resulting in high impact in terms of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Among different factors that can be identified as the causes of poor blood pressure (BP) control in the general population of patients with hypertension, the excessive use of monotherapy, as opposed to combination therapy, is arguably one of the most significant. In this perspective, the use of combination therapies having synergic and complementary actions has been shown to reduce BP levels to increase the percentage of patients who respond to antihypertensive treatment and achieve the recommended BP targets. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated that these strategies provide effective protection against hypertension-related organ damage, as well as a significant reduction of major cardiovascular events. While currently available evidence supports an increasingly important role of combination therapies compared with monotherapies, several other issues remain to be clarified. Among these, it has not yet been clearly established which classes of drugs should be considered for combination strategies, at what doses each component should be used, and whether combination strategies may be definitively considered as a first choice for the treatment of hypertensive patients at cardiovascular risk. Another relevant aspect concerns the choice between fixed and free combination therapies. This article discusses and analyses the different factors that may contribute to achieve effective BP control. In particular, the potential benefits and drawbacks associated with the use of fixed versus free combination therapies for hypertension treatment will be examined and discussed. The benefits of using combination strategies based on drugs that antagonize the renin-angiotensin system and dihydropyridine calcium antagonists will also be discussed, with a particular focus on amlodipine besylate combination therapies.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansHypertensionRenin-Angiotensin SystemAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID21895049
OpenAlexW171401359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.