Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21894933›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2011

Salt effects on condensed protamine-DNA assemblies: anion binding and weakening of attraction.

Jason E DeRouchey, Donald C Rau

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason E DeRoucheyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0055, United States. derouchey@uky.edu
Donald C Rau
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

Assembly Forces And Recognition ReactionsZIAHD008747 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI RAU, DONALD · 2009 to 2015
$2.7M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HD008747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using osmotic stress coupled with X-ray scattering, we have directly examined the salt sensitivity of the intermolecular forces between helices in condensed protamine-DNA arrays. Thermodynamic forces are measured from the dependence of DNA helical interaxial spacings on external salt concentration or the osmotic pressure applied by neutral polymer solutions in equilibrium with the condensed phase. Force curves of salmon protamine-DNA condensates are highly dependent on salt species and concentration, indicating salt binding to protamine-DNA complexes. This dependence of the forces on salt species follows the Hofmeister series for anions. Chaotropic anions bind more tightly to protamine-DNA arrays than kosmotropic anions, thus more greatly disrupting the attractive thermodynamic forces. Variations with cation type are small compared with those observed for anions. Further, osmotic stress is used to estimate the number of ions bound in the condensed phase through a Gibbs-Duhem relationship. We estimate that at equilibrium, ∼1 Br(-) is bound per protamine molecule at 200 mM NaBr concentration. Remarkably, this one bound anion results in a change of ∼12% in the surface-to-surface distance between DNA helices. Potential biological implications of this attractive force salt sensitivity are discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnionsBromidesDNAProtaminesProtein BindingSalmonSaltsSodium CompoundsThermodynamicsAnionsBromidesDNAProtaminesSaltssodium bromideSodium Compounds

Identifiers

PMID21894933
PMCPMC3228241
OpenAlexW1982156715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.