ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2011
Mutation induction by inhaled radon progeny modeled at the tissue level.
Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of spatial variation in dose delivery: what can we learn from radon-related lung cancer studies?Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2022Review
- Multi-scaled Monte Carlo calculation for radon-induced cellular damage in the bronchial airway epithelium.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Internal microdosimetry of alpha-emitting radionuclides.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2020Review
- Mechanistic study on lung cancer mortality after radon exposure in the Wismut cohort supports important role of clonal expansion in lung carcinogenesis.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2016Article
- Erratum to: Mutation induction by inhaled radon progeny modeled at the tissue level.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2016Article
- The cellular and molecular carcinogenic effects of radon exposure: a review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The observable responses of living systems to ionizing radiation depend on the level of biological organization studied. Understanding the relationships between the responses characteristic of the different levels of organization is of crucial importance. The main objective of the present study is to investigate how some cellular effects of radiation manifest at the tissue level by modeling mutation induction due to chronic exposure to inhaled radon progeny. For this purpose, a mathematical model of the bronchial epithelium was elaborated to quantify cell nucleus hits and cell doses. Mutagenesis was modeled considering endogenous as well as radiation-induced DNA damages and cell cycle shortening due to cell inactivation. The model parameters describing the cellular effects of radiation are obtained from experimental data. Cell nucleus hits, cell doses, and mutation induction were computed for the activity hot spots of the large bronchi at different exposures. Results demonstrate that the mutagenic effect of densely ionizing radiation is dominated by cell cycle shortening due to cell inactivation and not by DNA damages. This suggests that radiation burdens of non-progenitor cells play a significant role in mutagenesis in case of protracted exposures to densely ionizing radiation. Mutation rate as a function of dose rate exhibits a convex shape below a threshold. This threshold indicates the exhaustion of the tissue regeneration capacity of local progenitor cells. It is suggested that progenitor cell hyperplasia occurs beyond the threshold dose rate, giving a possible explanation of the inverse dose-rate effect observed in the epidemiology of lung cancer among uranium miners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.