ArticleNature reviews. Endocrinology2011
A patient with a large recurrent pheochromocytoma demonstrating the pitfalls of diagnosis.
Article in Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Von Hippel-Lindau Disease: Current Challenges and Future Prospects.OncoTargets and therapy · 2020Review
- Ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of benign and suspicious adrenal lesions.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014Article
- Retroperitoneal paraganglioma manifesting as paralytic ileus: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA 59-year-old man presented for a follow-up, 6 years after surgery for a large pheochromocytoma. He had suffered from diabetes mellitus, hypertension and abdominal pain in the right flank region. Previous postoperative follow-up did not reveal tumor recurrence. INVESTIGATION: Measurement of plasma free metanephrine and normetanephrine by high-performance liquid chromatography and radioimmunoassay; 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy; hybrid 123I-MIBG single-photon emission CT (SPECT)-CT; MRI; testing for plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine; intraoperative ultrasonography; histological staining for chromogranin A and synaptophysin; and postoperative 18F-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) PET scan. DIAGNOSIS: Recurrent pheochromocytoma. MANAGEMENT: Laparotomy with tumor resection. Reduction of antihypertensive medications. Further follow-up by MRI, hybrid 123I-MIBG SPECT-CT and testing for plasma catecholamines and free metanephrines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.