ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2011
Colonoscopy: basic principles and novel techniques.
Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adenoma detection at colonoscopy by polypectomy in withdrawal only versus both insertion and withdrawal: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Trial
- MicroRNAs and Other Small RNAs in Liquid Biopsies as Biomarkers for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mobile endoscopy in rural South Africa: outcomes of a decentralised outreach programme to improve gastrointestinal healthcare access.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Photoacoustic-Integrated Multimodal Approach for Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Review
- Downregulation of MT2-MMP and MT5-MMP in ulcerative colitis serves a diagnostic predictor and potential therapeutic targets.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- UViT-Seg: An Efficient ViT and U-Net-Based Framework for Accurate Colorectal Polyp Segmentation in Colonoscopy and WCE Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- BFE-Net: bilateral fusion enhanced network for gastrointestinal polyp segmentation.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Gut microbiota dynamics and fecal SCFAs after colonoscopy: accelerating microbiome stabilization by Clostridium butyricum.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Progress of near-infrared-II fluorescence in precision diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Effect of Visual Booklets to Improve Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- A Real-Time Polyp-Detection System with Clinical Application in Colonoscopy Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- Upregulation of p16INK4A in Peripheral White Blood Cells as a Novel Screening Marker for Colorectal Carcinoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022Article
- Low volume polyethylene glycol combined with senna versus high volume polyethylene glycol, which regimen is better for bowel preparation for colonoscopy? A randomized, controlled, and single-blinded trial.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Liquid Biopsy-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening via Surface Markers of Circulating Tumor Cells.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Adequacy of Anesthesia Guidance for Colonoscopy Procedures.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Electrochemical biosensors for measurement of colorectal cancer biomarkers.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2021Review
- Biomarkers for detecting colorectal cancer non-invasively: DNA, RNA or proteins?World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Review
- Linked color imaging enhances endoscopic detection of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps.Endoscopy international open · 2018Article
- A complex microsatellite at chromosome 7q33 as a new prognostic marker of colorectal cancer.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Nodular lymphoid hyperplasia: A marker of low-grade inflammation in irritable bowel syndrome?World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colonoscopy is considered the 'gold standard' for detection and removal of premalignant lesions in the colon. However, studies suggest that colonoscopy is less protective for right-sided than for left-sided colorectal cancer. Optimizing the effectiveness of colonoscopy is a continuous process, and during the past decade several important quality indicators have been defined that can be used to measure the performance of colonoscopy and to identify areas for quality improvement. The quality of bowel preparation can be enhanced by split-dose regimens, which are superior to single-dose regimens. Cecal intubation rates should approximate 95% and can be optimized by good technique. In selected patients, specific devices can be used to facilitate cecal intubation. Adenoma detection rates should be monitored and exceed a minimum of 25% in men and 15% in women. To this aim, optimal withdrawal technique and adequate time for inspection are of utmost importance. Of all advanced imaging techniques, chromoendoscopy is the only technique with proven benefit for adenoma detection. Finally, the technique of polypectomy affects the number of complications as well as the success of completely removing a lesion. In this Review, we provide an overview of both standard and novel colonoscopy techniques and their impact on quality indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21894202What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.